Critical Pathways for Responsible AI in Development
As the AI for Good Global Summit concludes, the development community faces a pivotal moment. Moving beyond reactive measures means tackling the deep-rooted epistemological, technological, and governance gaps shaping today's AI landscape. This article outlines three essential recommendations for development professionals and partners to lead in building responsible, context-aware AI systems that drive inclusive progress.
AI in Local Problem-Solving
Cultivate Contextual Adaptation
AI solutions often default to a one-size-fits-all approach, yet decades of development experience stress the need for local adaptation. Ignoring local knowledge systems and power dynamics undermines effectiveness and risks perpetuating inequalities. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face not only technical constraints but also gaps in regulatory capacity, with existing global AI governance frameworks lacking meaningful LMIC representation.
It's crucial to enable LMIC actors to influence governance frameworks, standards, and oversight mechanisms. Without local co-design, agentic AI systems risk automating decisions detached from the communities they affect, repeating colonial patterns at scale.
Research on civic tech highlights dangers like isomorphic mimicry, where global systems mimic local processes without fostering real innovation. For example, African digital democracy often emphasizes civil society-led 'watchdog' initiatives rather than government-run participation platforms, demanding AI designs that respect these democratic traditions.
AI can support social good in LMICs through non-traditional data sources and deep learning, enabling real-time urban governance and decision-making in Global South cities.
Addressing Critical Gaps
Current donor efforts overlook key areas:
- AI-enabled technology-facilitated gender-based violence, despite recognition by UNESCO
- Governance of open-source AI systems
- Promotion of public AI strategies
- Development of AI systems aligned with local, not external, interests
These gaps present clear opportunities for the development sector to take leadership rather than follow established patterns.
Strengthen Local Capacity and Innovation
Amplify Local Voices from Analysis to Action
Moving from extractive research to genuine co-creation means recognizing local digital innovation communities as authoritative partners in AI design. Many AI initiatives remain concentrated in a few African countries with existing digital ecosystems—Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, Nigeria, Uganda—leaving other regions excluded from development and implementation.
Fundamental change is needed to position affected communities as co-designers, not just end-users. LMIC actors require support to develop and govern AI systems that ensure sovereignty and sustainability. Strengthening civic tech ecosystems and transdisciplinary local research networks is essential.
Advance Research to Guide Contextual AI Development
Addressing AI challenges demands two complementary approaches: responsible use of AI within development research and development of AI systems that tackle global development issues. Advocating for responsible AI requires critical reflection on our own AI use.
While theoretical frameworks are emerging from decades of development experience, the rapid pace of AI calls for building these frameworks alongside practical experimentation. This process is challenging but necessary.
Build Inclusive Foundations
Foster Critical AI Literacy
The goal is to develop analytical skills that help determine when AI should augment human capabilities and when trust in automation is risky. Building critical AI literacy within government, civil society, and local innovation ecosystems is key for participatory and accountable AI design.
This literacy empowers communities to engage with AI, question its impact, and co-create governance frameworks aligned with local values. Without it, AI initiatives risk reinforcing existing power imbalances and dependency.
Strengthen Data Security and Multilingual Inclusion
Beyond complying with global data protection rules, development practice must address unique vulnerabilities introduced by AI. Generative AI especially raises new privacy and security challenges not covered by current protocols.
This issue extends beyond technology to power and control over information—particularly for low-resource languages vulnerable to data poisoning.
Ensuring data quality and protection in low-resource governance contexts requires flexible, outcome-focused regulation targeting specific high-risk AI applications rather than broad tool bans. Prioritizing open, multilingual, multimodal AI resources enhances accessibility and local relevance. Community-led dataset creation that embeds local values builds trust and strengthens these efforts.
Conclusion: From Reaction to Leadership
Digital rights advocacy has spotlighted areas demanding urgent attention. To move beyond slogans, the development community must:
- Champion AI solutions that reflect local priorities
- Invest in local leadership and innovation ecosystems
- Build inclusive, trusted data and knowledge infrastructures
This is about ensuring AI serves development goals—not the other way around. As the AI for Good Global Summit challenges us to rethink possibilities, the development sector has the chance to shape AI systems rooted in equity and local context, making technology a partner in human progress worldwide.
Your membership also unlocks:
