Engineers Evolve Beyond Low-Level Tasks as GenAI Transforms Product Design
AI is taking the grunt work out of product development. Prototyping, testing, and code generation can now run on autopilot, while teams focus on what actually moves the needle: defining the problem, choosing the right objectives, and exploring system-level trade-offs.
MathWorks expert Seth DeLand puts it plainly: the engineers who win are the ones who guide and verify AI, not the ones who spend days writing boilerplate code or manual tests.
At a Glance
- AI automates prototyping, testing, and iterative design without physical prototypes.
- Engineers set objectives and constraints while AI explores solutions.
- Large language models now assist with software and requirements analysis.
- Low-level implementation work loses value as AI handles it reliably.
- The edge shifts to system thinking: problem framing, objective-setting, trade-offs.
- Technical depth still matters for verification and oversight.
- Teams need automation for routine tasks and higher-level tools to define problem spaces.
From Implementation to System Thinking
Back in 2018, generative design meant algorithms proposing shapes within a design space. Today, large language models expand that capability across the entire product lifecycle. According to Seth DeLand, these models can draft software, assist with requirements, and support analysis-freeing engineers to direct the process instead of hand-coding every detail.
The shift is clear: low-level work becomes a commodity; framing the right problem becomes the craft.
Prototyping Without Waiting on Hardware
Software prototypes now spin up quickly. AI can generate first-pass code and tests, then loop through runs, analysis, and refinements. No lab slot. No parts lead times. Just iteration.
Physical prototypes still matter, but you can reserve them for high-fidelity checkpoints. When you only need a low-fidelity answer fast, software-driven loops cut time and often improve quality by catching issues earlier.
Testing That Writes Itself (Mostly)
Generative tools create baseline unit tests and scaffolding, then expand coverage as requirements evolve. Engineers step in where it counts: defining acceptance criteria, stress cases, edge conditions, and safety constraints. AI does the repetition; you handle the decisions.
Requirements: Clearer, Faster, Less Risk
Large language models can flag ambiguous wording, conflicting requirements, and missing constraints. On multi-team projects, that feedback tightens alignment and reduces costly rework. DeLand notes that letting AI assist with requirements review is already saving big teams hours per week.
Sustainability as a First-Class Objective
Energy, materials, and lifecycle impact sit alongside performance and cost. Treat them as design objectives and constraints, then let AI explore the trade space. If you can quantify it, you can optimize it-and compare options with clearer data.
What Product Leaders Should Do Now
- Re-scope roles: shift engineers from implementation to objective-setting, verification, and system trade-offs.
- Standardize prompts and guardrails: define how your org uses AI for code, tests, and requirements.
- Invest in models and simulators: the faster your virtual loop, the fewer physical builds you need.
- Measure loop speed: track time from idea to simulated evidence, not just time to first prototype.
- Upskill for oversight: make verification, model-based design, and data literacy standard.
Practical Workflow You Can Pilot This Quarter
- Frame the problem: objectives, constraints, metrics, and acceptable risks.
- Seed the system model: start simple, then refine fidelity only where it changes decisions.
- Automate the loop: AI drafts code and tests, runs simulations, and reports results with charts and diffs.
- Review and decide: engineers assess trade-offs, adjust objectives, and greenlight the next iteration.
Skills That Matter More Now
- System-level thinking: define target behaviors, interfaces, and trade-offs.
- Verification literacy: statistical checks, failure modes, and assumption audits.
- Modeling and simulation: know what fidelity is "good enough" and when to increase it.
- Prompt strategy: structure inputs for reproducible code, tests, and requirement reviews.
Tools to Consider
- LLMs for code and requirements: OpenAI, Anthropic.
- Modeling and simulation: MathWorks toolchains for AI in design, optimization, and control.
- Automated testing: unit test frameworks, CI pipelines, and coverage tools integrated with your LLM workflow.
- Requirements platforms with AI review to catch ambiguity and conflicts early.
A Note from Seth DeLand
DeLand highlights a simple pattern: engineers define goals and constraints; AI explores options. Reinforcement learning and generative methods fit naturally here, especially for control strategies. The human role doesn't shrink-it shifts to defining success and validating outcomes.
Bottom Line
The value isn't in typing faster code. It's in asking better questions, setting sharper objectives, and verifying results with judgment. Move your team up the stack, and let AI handle the routine. That's how you ship smarter products with fewer cycles.
Next Step: Upskill Your Team
If you're building a skills plan for product roles, this curated catalog can help: AI courses by job. Pick one pilot, set a clear KPI for loop speed or defect reduction, and get the flywheel turning.
Your membership also unlocks:
