Football Writers' Association moves to protect journalism in the age of AI
The Football Writers' Association has launched a formal initiative to engage with leading AI companies and regulators over how journalistic work is used by AI platforms. The goal is simple: protect attribution, compensation, and the long-term health of professional reporting as AI tools deliver direct answers to users.
This move follows growing concern that AI search interfaces and large language models are summarizing published reporting so effectively that users never click through. Less traffic means weaker ad revenue, slower subscription growth, and a fragile business model for digital journalism.
What's at stake for writers
For more than two decades, search-driven discovery has fueled the economics of online publishing. AI-mediated answers are changing that model by serving consolidated responses upfront, often without a path back to the source.
- Referral loss: Zero-click answers drain the oxygen that keeps independent outlets alive.
- Attribution gaps: Credit is inconsistent, and links-when they appear-often sit below the fold of an instant answer.
- Compensation risk: Use of reporting to train or power AI responses is rarely matched with clear payment frameworks.
- Uneven playing field: Licensing deals tend to favor large publishers; independents on YouTube, podcasts, newsletters, and social feeds are left out.
- Opt-out burden: Current proposals often push individual journalists and publishers to police their own exclusions, instead of setting fair, industry-wide standards.
Who's leading this effort
The Football Writers' Association has appointed Will Muirhead, a sports industry entrepreneur and independent publisher, to lead engagement with AI platforms, policymakers, and industry stakeholders. The work will explore regulatory and commercial models that support innovation while protecting professional journalism and media plurality.
The association plans to contribute to ongoing policy consultations and convene discussions between rights holders and technology companies in the coming months.
What you can do right now
While industry standards are debated, take steps that strengthen your position today. Small moves compound when done consistently.
- Audit exposure: Identify which AI search experiences are surfacing your beats or verticals. Track referral shifts, not just total traffic.
- Set crawler rules: Update robots.txt and relevant meta directives to manage access from AI crawlers where appropriate. For example, see OpenAI's GPTBot guidance here.
- Label rights clearly: Add human-readable and machine-readable terms for content usage, syndication, and excerpts. Make your licensing position obvious.
- Diversify discovery: Deepen direct channels-newsletters, podcasts, communities-so your relationship with readers isn't dependent on a single gateway.
- Strengthen attribution: Use distinctive assets (original datasets, charts, embeds) and consistent bylines to make provenance harder to strip out.
- Document value: Keep a record of scoops, exclusives, and investigative work that drive follow-on coverage. It helps in negotiations and policy submissions.
- Organize: Coordinate with peer groups and associations to pool leverage in talks with platforms and regulators.
Regulation and industry standards: where this could land
The core questions are clear: What counts as fair use in AI training and answers? How should attribution be enforced? What compensation models are workable across outlets of all sizes? Expect more scrutiny from competition and media regulators as AI becomes a gatekeeper.
For context on regulatory direction in the UK, review the Competition and Markets Authority's work on foundation models here. Use this to inform submissions, identify pressure points, and align with sector-wide recommendations.
How the FWA initiative helps
Centralizing this conversation reduces the burden on individual writers. Instead of thousands of freelancers and small publishers trying to negotiate alone, the FWA can press for standards that scale: consistent attribution, transparent usage, and compensation that doesn't exclude independents.
By convening rights holders and technology companies, the association can push for practical frameworks-clear opt-in/opt-out mechanisms, credible audit trails, and licensing models that work beyond the biggest media groups.
For writers who want to stay proactive
- Explore practical techniques and tool workflows in AI for Writers.
- If you contribute to consultations or policy work, this overview may help you structure input: AI for Policy Makers.
The signal is clear: AI-generated answers are changing how audiences find and consume reporting. Standards set now will define whether independent journalism thrives or fades into background training data. The FWA's move is a push to make sure professional reporting remains visible, valued, and viable.
Your membership also unlocks:
