Beyond Process Development: How AI Is Changing Digital Twins in Biopharma
Digital twins started as a way to test unit operations before a run hit the plant. That's still useful, but the story is bigger now. Teams are using models to monitor live processes, automate control, and cut risk during tech transfer and scale-up.
For IT and development teams, this shift means new data pipelines, faster modeling cycles, and more autonomy on the factory floor. The payoff: shorter time to market, fewer experiments, and cleaner, more predictable batches.
Where Digital Twins Deliver Value Today
- Process development: Simulate unit operations, reduce the number of wet-lab experiments, and lock in parameters earlier.
- Manufacturing: Train operators safely, test process changes before rollout, forecast performance, and support predictive reliability and quality.
- Soft sensors: Estimate hard-to-measure variables (e.g., nutrient levels, viral vector titer) from live data to improve control loops.
- Tech transfer and scale-up: De-risk moving from lab to plant and from one site or partner to another using model-based simulation.
Proof Points You Can Take to Your CFO
One team cut impurities from hundreds of ppm to 20 ppm and reduced crystallization time from eight hours to 20 minutes using simulation. Another team used models to evaluate spray drying variations without burning budget on each experiment.
At scale, this adds up. GSK runs 54 digital twin models across 12 products to simulate processes, anticipate issues, support scale-up, and even guide equipment selection. For one vaccine, a twin helped free capacity to produce an extra million doses.
AI Is Lowering the Barrier to Twins
Historically, building a twin meant months of manual modeling. That's shifting. Vendors are embedding AI so teams can configure and validate models faster, using data from assets like chromatography skids to auto-generate first-principles or hybrid models.
Expect both deterministic and hybrid approaches: classic physics where it's clear, data-driven where it isn't, and combinations that use the best of both. The direction is clear-more capable models, easier deployment.
Compute and Data: The Two Real Constraints
- Data availability: Better online sensors and reliable historian access are non-negotiable. Without clean signals and context, models drift.
- Computational cost: Speedups come from parallelization, improved solvers, or replacing full mechanistic solvers with data-driven or hybrid surrogates.
Artificial neural networks can act as surrogates for mechanistic models-faster to run but data-hungry. Physics-informed neural networks reduce data needs by enforcing physical constraints in the network.
For context, see a general primer on digital twins.
From Single Assets to a Digital Thread
The next phase moves past isolated models. Companies are connecting twins across R&D, manufacturing, and supply chain-a digital thread. With AI and automation, these systems can adjust in real time and prevent failures with minimal oversight.
That means fewer handoffs, faster decisions, and higher throughput. It also means more responsibility for IT and dev teams to build the plumbing, governance, and guardrails.
Practical Blueprint for IT and Development Teams
- Data ingestion: Stream from DCS/SCADA via OPC UA/MQTT, capture batch context, and write to a time-series store plus object storage. Keep unit consistency and metadata tight.
- Semantic layer: Standardize tags, equipment hierarchies, and batch genealogy. Create reusable feature views for modeling.
- Model stack: Support mechanistic solvers, data-driven models (e.g., gradient boosting, neural nets), and hybrids (including PINNs). Containerize everything.
- Serving and control: Expose models via low-latency APIs. For closed-loop control, implement guardrails, safe fallback states, and change control.
- MLOps/GxP: Version datasets, models, and configs. Automate validation, audit trails, and approvals. Separate dev, test, and qualified prod environments.
- Monitoring: Track data drift, model confidence, and impact on batch outcomes. Trigger human review on out-of-bounds predictions.
- Security: Enforce least privilege across plant networks, segment model-serving endpoints, and log every access with time sync.
Fast Wins (Next 90 Days)
- Pick one unit operation (e.g., chromatography): build a soft sensor from historical data, validate against recent runs, and shadow the live process.
- Stand up a twin for tech transfer of a current process: align tags, parameters, and batch definitions with the receiving site; simulate edge cases.
- Operationalize model monitoring: metrics, alert rules, and retraining triggers integrated with your QMS and change control.
Metrics That Matter
- Time to build/qualify a model
- Reduction in wet-lab experiments and scale-up deviations
- Yield, impurity ppm, cycle time, and energy per batch
- Alarm rate, unplanned downtime, and first-pass quality
- Tech transfer lead time and batch release time
Risks and Guardrails
- Data quality: Missing sensors and bad tags will sink accuracy. Fix data first.
- Model drift: Put monitoring and retraining on a schedule, not on hope.
- Explainability: Use hybrid or constrained models where regulators expect traceability.
- Validation: Treat model updates like code changes-V&V, documentation, and approvals.
Digital twins already pay off in biopharma. With AI, they're getting easier to build, faster to run, and more useful across the product lifecycle. Teams that invest in data plumbing, model operations, and compliance today will bank the biggest gains tomorrow.
Level up your team's skills: Explore practical AI learning paths for developers and engineers at Complete AI Training.
Your membership also unlocks:
