From Pilot to Practice: Hanna Center's Workflow-First Path to AI Value

Skip the hype: treat AI as a workflow choice, not a press release. Hanna Center saved hours and cut bottlenecks by starting small, measuring value, and scaling what worked.

Categorized in: AI News Legal
Published on: Nov 01, 2025
From Pilot to Practice: Hanna Center's Workflow-First Path to AI Value

AI Hype Won't Fix Your Work. Operational Discipline Will.

Legal headlines swing between utopia and doomsday. Either robots replace attorneys or we hide the stapler and hope for the best.

Back in reality, AI is a business decision. A meaningful one-but still about process, resourcing, and measurable outcomes.

That's what the Hanna Center proved. They treated AI as a workflow challenge, not a press release, and built a system that stretched limited resources without stretching risk.

Start With the Why

Their problem was familiar: too much manual work for a small team. Hours lost to tasks that didn't move the mission.

Instead of chasing tools, we focused on value. Where does time leak? What can be safely offloaded? How do we protect people, data, and the organization?

Grounding the project in an operational problem changed everything. It created space to measure outcomes that matter-time back, fewer bottlenecks, and clearer ownership.

Build a Roadmap, Not a Toy Box

A workflow audit identified nine use cases and ranked them by complexity. The rollout started with simple, high-friction tasks and expanded as results proved out.

By 2025, Hanna deployed ChatGPT Enterprise to 50 staff. The adoption plan was structured, cross-functional, and designed for measurement-surveys (27 users), seven focus groups, and clear ROI targets.

The results were concrete: an average of 4.13 hours saved per week per user-about $22,767 in monthly value across departments. Teams reported faster reports, less vendor dependence, and more autonomy.

Comfort levels averaged 4.1/5. Writing and editing were the most common uses for 81% of staff. The program didn't just save time-it sparked over 50 new use case ideas.

Pilot Small, Build Smart

The first wins were low-risk, high-friction workflows. Automating data extraction from ancillary services invoices and high school transcripts. Drafting trauma-informed care policy updates. Simplifying program manuals.

Those gains built trust and freed time for deeper work. From there, moderate-complexity projects followed: automated dashboards, impact reports blending survey data and narrative, and curriculum drafts for the Hanna Institute.

Each step refined both the process and the operations playbook-risk management, change readiness, and metrics sat at the center. Every improvement was documented. Every win was repeatable.

By full adoption, the program was a living operations system: start small, prove value, scale with intention.

What Legal Teams Can Borrow Today

  • Low-risk, high-friction (week 1-2): email and memo drafts, formatting briefs and reports, intake triage suggestions, invoice line-item QA (LEDES sanity checks), policy summaries, RFP/RFI first drafts-with review by counsel.
  • Moderate complexity (month 1-2): contract clause comparisons with citations to your playbook, matter status summaries from notes, research scaffolds with linked sources, outside counsel report templates, knowledge base clean-up and tagging.
  • Later stage: dashboarding legal ops metrics, playbook-driven review checklists, standardized discovery correspondence drafts-with human validation at every step.

Principle to remember: rank use cases by complexity and data sensitivity. Start where friction is high and risk is low. Expand only after value is proven.

Guardrails That Make Adoption Stick

  • Use enterprise-grade tools with encryption, admin controls, and auditability. For example, see how ChatGPT Enterprise handles data control and privacy.
  • Protect privilege and confidentiality. Keep sensitive workstreams siloed. Treat outputs as drafts. Require human review where legal judgment is involved.
  • Adopt a risk framework. Define acceptable use, data classes, and escalation paths. The NIST AI RMF is a solid reference.
  • Measure what matters. Track hours saved, cycle time, rework rate, and reliance on outside vendors. Tie wins to budget impact and client satisfaction.

The 30-Day Starter Plan

  • Week 1: Pick three low-risk workflows. Write clear prompts and guardrails. Set baseline metrics.
  • Week 2: Run pilots with 5-10 users. Hold office hours. Collect friction points and wins daily.
  • Week 3: Standardize what works. Convert prompts into templates. Document do's/don'ts.
  • Week 4: Report outcomes. Scale two workflows. Park anything noisy for a later phase.

What Hanna Center Proved

Real progress isn't about chasing the newest tool. It comes from disciplined operational design that turns experiments into repeatable workflows.

Hanna's teams saved time, reduced outside spend, and built internal capacity. More importantly, they built trust-because the work got easier and the results were measured.

Treat AI as an operational enhancement, not a disruptive overhaul. Start small. Prove value. Scale what works.

If You're Ready to Skill Up Your Team

If you need practical training to roll this out across legal and adjacent functions, explore curated options by role at Complete AI Training.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)
Advertisement
Stream Watch Guide