How Korean universities are winning top researchers without matching big-tech salaries
South Korea's leading universities are rewriting their hiring playbooks. Instead of trying to outbid U.S. and European institutions, they're prioritizing research continuity, flexible appointments, serious lab support, and startup pathways. The result: meaningful hires in their 30s-50s who plan to build long-term programs in Korea.
The signal is clear-give scientists what they need to produce real work, and they'll take the pay cut. Across campuses, leaders are dropping rigid processes, funding advanced tools, and moving fast when talent appears.
Case study: SKKU brings in Tesla's Optimus developer
Sungkyunkwan University recruited Dr. Ahn Minsung, a lead developer behind Tesla's bipedal robot Optimus. To land him, SKKU launched a new robotics department, skipped the mandatory paper review step, and used a technical interview centered on live evidence-watching Optimus perform balance and perturbation tasks.
They also allowed him to remain at Tesla in the U.S. until February next year before relocating. The pay is lower, but SKKU committed to the research conditions he asked for. His target: build a homegrown humanoid within two years.
KAIST: flexible appointments and full-stack lab support
KAIST recruited Professor Kang Sung-hoon from Johns Hopkins to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. He's known for work in bio-inspired materials, with multiple papers in top-tier journals, and was allowed to keep a concurrent role to finish ongoing projects in the U.S.
KAIST backed the move with major lab investments-high-cost experimental equipment, housing support, and continuity for his team. Leadership is clear about the strategy: protect the scientist's momentum. In two recent hires, KAIST even accepted 20 incoming graduate students with the professors to maintain lab throughput from day one.
From IBM Research to SKKU: a bet on AI-driven drug discovery
Professor Kang Seung-goo left IBM Research for SKKU, taking his salary down to roughly one-third. A six-time recipient of IBM's top 1% researcher award, he focuses on AI methods that compress early drug discovery timelines by screening millions of compounds.
Interest in this domain surged after major advances in protein structure prediction, including AlphaFold's performance gains in CASP assessments. For context, see Nature's coverage of the AlphaFold breakthroughs. SKKU's draw was concrete: access to supercomputing, electron microscopy, and proximity to large hospital networks for clinical collaboration.
Yonsei and POSTECH: incentives plus national funding
Yonsei University recruited AI expert Professor Lee Bong-shin from Microsoft Research, offering multi-year incentives, research funds, and lighter teaching in the ramp-up period. It's a straightforward play: reduce friction so the lab can hit velocity.
POSTECH brought in Caltech's Dr. Choi Young-jun, known for multiple Nature publications, supported by about 3 billion KRW in research settlement funds through national programs aimed at attracting top scientists. This blend-university-level flexibility with government backing-closes practical gaps that salary alone can't.
Startup lanes as a talent magnet
Corporate labs pay well but often restrict independent ventures. Korean universities are using startup support as a counterweight: dedicated lab-to-startup spaces, admin help for early fundraising, and room to commercialize research.
KAIST's Professor Lee Ki-min moved from Google Research after evaluating multiple offers, including one from OpenAI. Despite a lower salary, he chose an environment where he could pursue his agenda and spin out. He's now active in a university-based venture with a colleague.
What's working: tactics you can copy
- Protect research continuity: allow concurrent appointments and transfer existing students to avoid downtime.
- Fund the core stack: high-end instruments, compute, and lab space that match the science, not the title.
- Hire on evidence: emphasize technical demos and reproducible outputs over rigid paperwork.
- Align teaching loads: front-load research time for the first 2-3 years to establish the program.
- Enable spinouts: provide space, admin support, and clear IP paths so professors can build companies.
- Leverage national programs: use external funding to bridge equipment and setup costs.
Why scientists are saying yes-despite lower salaries
The trade-off makes sense if you value speed and autonomy. A lab that gets the right tools, the right people, and fewer bottlenecks can outproduce one with a bigger paycheck but tighter constraints.
For mid-career and rising researchers, the question isn't "Who pays the most?" It's "Where can I build the strongest body of work in the next five years?" Korea's top universities are starting to answer that well.
If you lead hiring or run a lab
- Map the candidate's active projects and remove transition risks-students, data, compute, animal models, clinical ties.
- Offer explicit guarantees: instrument lists, delivery timelines, and space allocations in writing.
- Replace generic interviews with artifact reviews: preprints, code, datasets, live demos.
- Give a startup lane with a named contact for funding, legal, and admin hurdles.
For researchers planning a move
Push for what actually accelerates your work: equipment, team transfers, startup options, and reduced teaching early on. Salary matters, but traction compounds faster.
If you're building AI skills for translational research or spinouts, this curated directory can save time: AI courses by job.
The shift is simple: prioritize conditions that produce results. Korea's recent hires show that if the lab is set up right, talent will follow.
Your membership also unlocks:
