AI in UK Healthcare: High Anxiety, High Adoption, and a Clear Path Forward
New research from UK software firm Propel Tech points to a sharp tension in healthcare. Between 75% and 80% of respondents in healthcare and related public services believe AI could replace roles in most areas of work. Around three-quarters also think AI has the potential to cause more harm than good. That puts healthcare among the most anxious sectors in the UK workforce.
The perception gap is real
Nationally, 80% of early-career workers think AI will replace people in most areas of work, compared with 65% of senior leaders. Concern about AI causing more harm than good follows the same pattern, decreasing with seniority. In short: the closer you are to the frontline, the more uneasy you feel.
Meanwhile, investment is already happening
More than 95% of senior leaders report active AI investment in their organisations. Awareness is high across mid-level and early-career staff, too. The tools are entering services faster than trust is being built.
What "good" looks like in clinical settings
Healthcare professionals in the study prioritise well-being, training, and social responsibility when judging software. The expectation is simple: AI should support staff and patient outcomes, not just squeeze efficiency. That standard sets the bar for deployment choices and vendor accountability.
"AI is clearly moving quickly into critical services. In healthcare especially, the question is not just what the technology can do, but how it is introduced, governed and explained to the people delivering and receiving care."
"Where AI is positioned as an augmentation tool that improves safety, reduces repetitive workload and strengthens decision-making, trust grows. Where it feels imposed or opaque, anxiety increases, particularly in sectors built on human interaction."
What this means for your service
Healthcare doesn't reject AI-it rejects risk without clarity. Position AI as augmentation, with guardrails that keep clinicians in control. Pair any deployment with transparent communication, measurable outcomes, and time for training. Trust follows when people see improvements in safety, workload, and decisions.
A practical AI rollout checklist for healthcare teams
- Start with a specific problem: reduce admin time, improve triage accuracy, or surface safety risks earlier.
- Co-design with a multidisciplinary team and patient reps; map the workflow before picking a tool.
- Prioritise augmentation use cases first: documentation support, coding, scheduling, discharge summaries, clinical decision support with human oversight.
- Set clinical safety and governance from day one: risk assessments, data protection impact assessments, and a clear safety case with named owners.
- Keep a human in the loop with clear override rules, escalation paths, and role-based access.
- Be transparent: label AI outputs, publish known limitations, and state when data leaves your environment.
- Test for bias across demographics; monitor false positives/negatives and near-miss events.
- Train for confidence, not just competence: protected time, scenario-based drills, and hands-on practice.
- Measure what matters: safety indicators, clinical quality, patient experience, staff workload and well-being, and cost-to-serve.
- Stand up incident reporting and audit trails; review regularly and close the loop with staff.
- Communicate early with patients and staff about purpose, safeguards, and how to give feedback.
90-day starter plan
- Days 1-30: Define the use case, success metrics, and risks. Shortlist tools. Run a DPIA and safety review.
- Days 31-60: Pilot with a small, motivated clinical team. Track workload, safety, and decision quality weekly.
- Days 61-90: Publish results internally. Fix issues. Expand training. Decide to scale, pause, or stop.
Helpful resources
- WHO guidance on AI ethics in health for governance principles and patient safeguards.
- NICE Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health to align evaluation and evidence requirements.
For deeper, practical guidance
- AI for Healthcare for safe adoption, governance, and clinician-first workflows.
- AI Learning Path for Training & Development Managers for building effective upskilling and trust-building programs.
Bottom line
The sector's anxiety is justified. The fix isn't hype-it's careful design, honest communication, and measurable value at the bedside. Treat AI as augmentation, respect the people using it, and prove the improvement. That's how trust is built-and how care gets better.
Your membership also unlocks:
