AI's Uncanny Valley: Fashion's Next Playing Field
Fashion mirrors our collective mood. In 2025, the debate is clear: double down on craft and IRL community, or sprint into AI tools and stylists. The clash is loudest in campaigns, where taste, tech and brand codes collide.
Valentino's DeVain series is the current lightning rod. One piece by Christopher Royal King blends AI animation with bag motifs and concert crowds, bending forms into a hypnotic loop. Critics called it "AI slop." That's the point: leaning into entropy as a statement - not a shortcut.
Why the backlash matters
Luxury is coded. People expect precision, authorship and intent. Anything that looks lazy or hollow breaks trust fast.
King's process wasn't lazy. He shot the bags with primitive cameras (including a Fisher-Price PXL-2000), captured tape compression and tracking noise, then fed that analog grit into an AI model - and back into analog again. The loop produced an uncanny, archival texture by design.
The brand labeled the work as AI. The brief emphasized creative freedom and individuality, not a trick for cheaper visuals. This is the difference between a concept and a prompt dump.
The split you'll see in 2026
Creative teams are branching in two directions.
- "Clearly AI" surrealism: Intentionally unstable imagery, where chaos is the message. Done well, it functions like digital surrealism that photography can't touch.
- "Obviously human-made" craft: Tactile materials, rough type, texture-heavy compositions that show process and friction.
Both camps are asking the same question: what counts as "real" in a post-AI hype cycle? Feed a model only synthetic content and you invite hallucinations. Build with real footage, scans and analog artifacts, and you get structure to push against.
As one strategist put it, "It isn't AI replacing creativity, it's creativity purposefully misusing AI to expose where the boundaries actually are." That misuse - handled with taste - may be the next language of fashion surrealism.
Slop, honesty and the mood of now
Consumers are tired of glossy posturing and brand-filtered perfection. They're more open to transparent experiments, even glitchy ones, when the intent is clear. Some call it a "sloptimistic" stance: the appeal of content that asks nothing from you and makes no grand promise.
King leaned into that ennui. The work gestures at a bigger idea: tech sprints to a peak, then the questions go less practical, more philosophical. In other words, the uncanny valley isn't a bug. It's the subject.
Guardrails vs. brand codes
"It doesn't feel luxury when it's lazy." That criticism lands because luxury is built on consistency, detail and a clear point of view. CGI and VFX can go surreal and still feel premium. Generic AI often can't.
Valentino's direction reportedly set expectations around spirit, iconography, emotional tone and a high-end visual language. As King framed it: "Luxury isn't the absence of distortion, or new tools. It's the presence of a distinct point of view applied consistently enough that it becomes the brief."
Execution is the separator. As one creative leader said, "The brands who succeed won't be the ones who generate the most, but the ones who curate the best and refine it with the same intensity they bring to their products."
A practical playbook for creatives
- Define the tension: What will you distort, and what is sacred? Codify non-negotiables (logos, proportions, finish level, emotional tone).
- Build a hybrid pipeline: Capture real footage, scans and textures → iterate in AI → optionally pass back through analog or physical processes for coherence.
- Feed models with reality: Start from original assets. Avoid closed loops of AI-on-AI that drift into noise or hallucination.
- Use glitch with intent: Pick a single variable (motion smear, color bleed, frame tearing) and push it. Too many artifacts reads as careless.
- Be transparent: Label AI involvement. Don't fake a craft story you didn't earn.
- Test for fit: Run small releases. Read comments for sentiment and language, not just views. Protect long-term brand equity over short hits.
- Mind rights and labor: Clear datasets, likeness, music and model usage. Treat AI collaborators like vendors - with standards and reviews.
- Upskill your team: Creative direction now includes prompts, dataset curation and post-AI refinement. If you need a fast track, browse curated options at Complete AI Training - Courses by Job.
So, should luxury lean in?
Yes - with taste, constraints and a reason to exist. AI isn't a replacement for craft; it's a new surface for it. Purposeful chaos or proof-of-work craft can both feel premium when the brand's point of view runs the show.
The smart move is simple: embrace entropy strategically. Use it to ask better questions, not to dodge the work.
Your membership also unlocks:
