AI Doesn’t Need to Be Hacked to Leak Confidential Content
AI models don’t require hacking to spill sensitive information. They just need to be asked the right way. In the age of generative AI, confidential data isn’t only stored in files or servers—it lives within vectors, embeddings, and training tokens. Once a large language model (LLM) ingests information, there’s a real chance it might reproduce it.
Because LLMs learn from vast datasets, including user interactions, controlling what sensitive information they reveal is a unique challenge. Simply put, there’s no guaranteed way to make an LLM keep secrets.
Mitigation Strategies
This article explores practical steps to reduce the risk of sensitive information disclosure, which is ranked as the second-highest risk in OWASP’s Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025. Here’s what AI developers, CISOs, and product leaders need to focus on.
Sanitize Early and Often
The first line of defense is stopping sensitive data from reaching the model at all. This starts with thorough data hygiene. Training data, fine-tuning sets, and user inputs during inference must be sanitized by redacting, masking, or tokenizing sensitive elements.
Look out for personally identifiable information (PII), API keys, proprietary code, or business-critical terms before they touch the model. Many breaches happen because raw logs, exposed credentials, or support transcripts were mistakenly included in training sets. Using cybersecurity tools to scan and flag secrets in source repositories and documentation can help prevent this.
LLMs Are a Semi-Trusted User
Treat LLMs like semi-trusted users with limited access. Apply the principle of least privilege to every AI deployment. If an AI assistant doesn’t need access to billing, HR records, or internal contracts to perform its tasks, it shouldn’t have it.
Enforce strong access controls around runtime data and filter inbound and outbound queries through intermediate layers. Regularly audit logs for unusual prompt patterns or detailed responses, as these could indicate the model is disclosing unintended information.
When the Stakes Are Higher, So Should the Defenses
In sensitive industries such as healthcare, finance, or government, advanced privacy techniques are essential. Federated learning allows model training across decentralized systems without pooling sensitive data centrally, reducing exposure while maintaining performance.
Differential privacy adds statistical noise to outputs or model weights, making it difficult to reverse-engineer individual data. Although these methods might slightly impact accuracy, they greatly improve confidentiality, especially for high-risk workloads.
Guard the System Prompt Like It’s an API Key
The system prompt—the hidden instructions guiding model behavior—is a critical attack surface. If exposed or poorly secured, attackers can reverse-engineer roles, permissions, or data schemas.
Secure system prompts like environment variables or root keys. Remove developer mode access, limit verbose error messages, and prevent users from overriding foundational model behavior. The more hidden and controlled the system layer, the harder it is to manipulate or extract secrets.
Educate the Humans, Not Just the Machines
Technical measures alone aren’t enough. Many AI data leaks happen because users paste sensitive material into prompts without understanding the risks. Organizations should provide clear training, instructing users to avoid sharing PII, financial details, or proprietary content unless explicitly approved.
Vendors and platform providers must also be transparent about what data is stored or used for future training and offer opt-out options.
When vulnerabilities are found, companies tend to fix them faster than traditional software bugs. The average remediation time for a GenAI-related flaw is under 30 days. Still, prevention through design and user awareness remains the best defense.
Even Hardened Systems Leak: But That’s Not an Excuse
Research from Adversa AI and Northwestern University shows that even well-protected LLMs can be manipulated to disclose sensitive data under certain conditions. No single tool or framework can eliminate this risk completely.
OWASP recommends building resilient GenAI systems that are transparent, auditable, and realistic about their limits. Security isn’t about zero mistakes—it’s about minimizing harm and not amplifying errors.
This article is part of a series on the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025, highlighting actionable strategies for secure and transparent GenAI development.
Your membership also unlocks:
