HP to cut 4,000-6,000 jobs in AI pivot, targeting $1B savings by 2028

HP will cut 4-6k jobs by 2028 to free up $1B for AI efficiency, embedding AI agents across product, ops and support. Expect workflow redesign, pricier memory, and tighter margins.

Categorized in: AI News Product Development
Published on: Nov 27, 2025
HP to cut 4,000-6,000 jobs in AI pivot, targeting $1B savings by 2028

HP cuts 4,000-6,000 roles to fund AI efficiency: what product teams need to know

HP plans to reduce its global headcount by 4,000-6,000 roles by fiscal 2028 to drive USD 1B in cost savings through AI-led efficiency. The company is embedding "agentic AI" across operations to rework processes, speed development, and improve support outcomes.

Restructuring will cost approximately USD 650M, with about USD 250M in fiscal 2026. Earlier in 2025, HP also cut 1,000-2,000 roles as part of a separate plan.

Why it's happening

Early AI pilots showed that bolting AI onto old processes isn't enough. HP plans to redesign core workflows so AI systems can act with minimal human intervention and handoffs.

The cuts span product development, internal operations, and customer support-exactly the functions most exposed to automation and AI-driven decisioning.

Cost pressure you should plan for

Memory is getting pricier. HP says DRAM and NAND make up 15-18% of a typical PC's cost, and demand from AI infrastructure is pushing those prices higher. The company expects margin pressure in the second half of fiscal 2026 and projects FY26 adjusted EPS of USD 2.90-3.20, below prior expectations.

If your roadmap assumes stable memory costs or generous configurations, revisit it now. Background on DRAM and NAND flash can help frame the trade-offs.

Implications for product development

  • AI-as-operator: Expect more workflows run by agents. Design for clear guardrails, escalation paths, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints where risk or ambiguity is high.
  • Process redesign over feature add-ons: Map end-to-end flows and remove manual handoffs. AI works best when policies, data access, and decision logic are explicit.
  • Data and telemetry first: Instrument everything. Track agent decisions, outcomes, and exceptions to improve prompts, policies, and routing.
  • BOM and SKU pressure: Build memory-lean configurations that degrade gracefully. Consider model compression, on-device vs. cloud inference, and feature tiers tied to hardware.
  • Supplier diversification: Qualify lower-cost components without degrading experience. Keep modular options to swap memory or storage with minimal redesign.
  • Pricing and packaging: Align feature sets with cost-to-serve. Gate heavy inference or memory-intensive features behind tiers customers value.
  • Compliance resilience: Plan for region-specific builds as trade rules shift. Keep your component and model choices flexible.

90-day action plan for product teams

  • Workflow audit: Identify 5-10 high-volume tasks for agent automation. Estimate hours saved, risk level, and required data access.
  • AI operations playbook: Define prompts, policies, evaluation criteria, and fallback protocols. Include approval thresholds and incident response.
  • Ship one "agent inside" pilot: Start small (support triage, internal QA, quote generation). Instrument outcomes and iterate weekly.
  • Memory stress test: Model scenarios for +10-30% memory cost. Pre-approve downgrade paths (lower configs, feature toggles) to protect margins.
  • Supplier and SKU review: Add a backup memory supplier and validate performance. Simplify SKUs where it won't hurt adoption.
  • Upskill the team: Align on AI product patterns, evaluation metrics, and safety. Consider focused training via Complete AI Training.

Metrics to watch

  • Cost-to-serve per ticket or workflow
  • Agent containment and escalation rates
  • Unit margin by SKU; BOM variance vs. plan
  • Inference cost per active user/feature
  • Memory attach rate and return rates by configuration
  • CSAT/NPS for AI-driven experiences
  • Time-to-resolution and policy override frequency

Risks and guardrails

  • Quality drift: Evaluate agents continuously with golden datasets and real-user feedback.
  • Over-automation: Keep humans on critical paths until metrics prove stability.
  • Privacy and compliance: Log decisions, enforce least-privilege access, and retain audit trails.
  • User trust: Clearly label AI actions and provide easy escalation to a person.

The bigger picture

Across tech, companies are funding AI programs by cutting operating costs. HP's AI-enabled devices already represent 30%+ of recent PC shipments, signaling demand for AI-forward products.

For product teams, the takeaway is simple: redesign workflows for agents, harden your data pipelines, and build pricing and packaging that reflect real cost-to-serve. Efficiency will be table stakes; intelligent operations will be the differentiator.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)
Advertisement
Stream Watch Guide