Why 1 in 5 think AI will replace human insurance agents
Most customers don't want a bot to handle everything. Nearly two-thirds expect agentic artificial intelligence (AI) to support insurance service with humans still involved, while only 18.4% think it will replace human agents outright.
The data points are clear: 56.5% are comfortable using AI if a human option is available, compared with 42.5% who are comfortable engaging with AI alone. And among those not comfortable getting quotes via AI, 42.9% would try it if a human could step in when needed.
What customers are signaling
AI already boosts service with instant responses and 24/7 availability. But human oversight keeps trust and accuracy intact-especially when coverage nuances or claims decisions matter.
As one industry analyst put it, agentic AI "can make decisions in real time and is not just giving responses based on a set of pre-loaded instructions." That capability makes AI stronger in live chat and policy support-but it still benefits from a human safety net.
Actions for carriers, MGAs, and brokerages
- Make "human fallback" the default. Prominently offer a handoff to an agent in every AI touchpoint (quote, service, claims intake). It lifts adoption and reduces drop-off.
- Define clear escalation rules. Escalate on premium thresholds, complex risks, vulnerable customers, complaints, and any uncertainty in coverage interpretation.
- Use AI for intake; keep humans for judgment calls. Let AI gather data, prefill, validate, and route. Keep humans for exceptions, advice, and final approval where needed.
- Log everything for audit. Archive prompts, outputs, and handoffs. Review samples weekly to catch accuracy issues and bias early. See the NIST AI Risk Management Framework for governance guidance.
Where agentic AI fits right now
- Live chat service: Eligibility checks, document requests, endorsements, payment reminders, and appointment scheduling.
- Quote support: Prefilling applications, verifying answers, and highlighting missing details for faster turnaround.
- Claims FNOL: Structured intake, fraud flags, and smart routing to the right adjuster or repair partner.
- Producer support: Policy lookup, coverage comparisons, and timely cross-sell prompts-with guardrails.
Metrics that matter
- Speed: First-response time and time-to-resolution (AI-only and AI+human).
- Quality: Accuracy of answers/quotes, complaint rate, rework percentage.
- Customer outcomes: CSAT on AI interactions, opt-out-to-human rate, and post-handoff satisfaction.
- Economics: Containment rate with quality thresholds, conversion rate, cost per contact.
Risk checkpoints
- Disclosures: Tell customers when they're interacting with AI and how to reach a human instantly.
- Data protection: Limit PII exposure, encrypt, and restrict model training on sensitive data.
- Hallucinations: Ground answers in policy data and knowledge bases; block free-form advice on regulated topics.
- Fairness and compliance: Test for unintended bias and maintain auditable decision trails. See the NAIC AI principles.
90-day rollout blueprint
- Weeks 1-3: Pick one use case (e.g., quote chat). Prepare guardrails, escalation rules, and a human review queue. Run in shadow mode.
- Weeks 4-6: Pilot with limited hours. Track accuracy, handoff volume, and customer satisfaction. Fix gaps weekly.
- Weeks 7-9: Expand to a defined segment. Integrate CRM and policy systems. Add real-time monitoring and daily sampling.
- Weeks 10-12: Train frontline teams, script handoffs, and publish playbooks. Set quarterly audits and owner accountability.
The takeaway: customers will use agentic AI-but they want the safety of human expertise close by. Build your service around that expectation, and you'll get speed without sacrificing trust.
Need to upskill teams quickly on practical AI skills for insurance roles? Explore curated programs here: Complete AI Training - Courses by Job.
Your membership also unlocks:
