Illinois' new AI bills: what K-12 educators and district leaders need to prepare for
Illinois lawmakers just introduced six artificial intelligence bills that, if passed, would set clear rules for schools, workplaces, and professional services. For education, the package points to statewide guidance, a formal commission, and expectations that affect curriculum, policy, and vendor management.
Here's what matters for superintendents, curriculum directors, tech leaders, and principals - and what to do next.
SB3492: Statewide guidance for teaching AI and quantum computing
SB3492 directs the Illinois State Board of Education to create K-12 guidance for teaching artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and other fast-growing technologies. The intent is workforce-focused, pushing schools to prepare students for future jobs.
What to do now: start a curriculum gap check. Identify where computer science, data literacy, and AI concepts already live, and where short units or projects could fit without blowing up schedules. Build cross-curricular ties (CTE, math, ELA research, social studies ethics) so students see real applications.
HB5113: A statewide AI Use in Education Commission
HB5113 would create a commission to study how AI tools and smartphones affect learning, mental health, and classroom behavior. It must host 10 public meetings across the state and publish reports twice a year through 2030.
Action for districts: plan to participate. Prepare baseline data on student device use, disciplinary trends, cheating incidents, and teacher workload. Have a parent and student input plan ready so your community's reality shows up in those reports.
SB3571: Employers must report AI-driven layoffs
This bill would require employers to report when layoffs are caused by AI or automation. The state's economic development department would note AI as a cause in public layoff reports.
Why it matters for schools: it signals where jobs may contract and where new roles will emerge. CTE programs, counselors, and work-based learning teams can use this data to update pathways and advise students with current labor signals.
SB3601: Clear disclosure when you're talking to AI
Licensed professionals - from financial advisers to real-estate agents and more - would need to disclose when someone is interacting with AI instead of a human. While this bill targets state-regulated occupations, the standard is useful for K-12.
District takeaway: bake explicit AI disclosure into your communications and tools. If a chatbot answers parent questions or students use AI tutors, label it clearly and describe data use, limits, and how to reach a human.
SB3502 and SB3590: AI product liability
These twin bills set a framework that treats certain AI systems like consumer products. People and businesses could sue developers for defective design, weak warnings, or broken express warranties. Deployers - the organizations that use AI - could also be liable if they significantly alter or misuse a system.
District implications: procurement and IT need stronger guardrails. Require vendor warranties, detailed documentation of intended use, and plain-English warnings. Keep change logs for prompts, integrations, and settings. Train staff on approved use cases and prohibited ones, and avoid unvetted model fine-tuning that could count as "significant alteration."
What this means for schools and colleges
- Curriculum: map AI and data literacy into existing courses; add short, standards-aligned projects rather than full course overhauls.
- Assessment: make room for AI-aware assignments (process notes, oral defenses, version histories) to reduce misuse and value original thought.
- Student well-being: set clear smartphone and AI classroom norms; track attention, workload, and stress data to inform policy.
- Equity: ensure access to approved AI tools and teacher support across schools so benefits aren't limited to a few classrooms.
- Careers: use AI-layoff reporting to update CTE pathways and career counseling with live labor signals.
District action plan (start this quarter)
- Form an AI steering group: curriculum, IT, legal, special education, counseling, teacher reps, and a student voice.
- Inventory tools: list every AI-enabled product, data flows, and where student information is involved.
- Write plain policies: disclosure rules, acceptable use, data retention, accessibility, and how to reach a human for help.
- Tighten procurement: require vendor AI disclosures, model sources, safety testing, bias audits, and warranties.
- Train staff: short, practical PD on prompts, evaluation, and classroom management with AI present.
- Engage families: publish an AI FAQ, note which tools are used, how they're monitored, and opt-out options where applicable.
- Measure impact: track outcomes (learning, attendance, incidents, teacher time saved) to report into the commission's process.
What to watch next
If these bills move forward, ISBE guidance will set the baseline for curriculum and district policy. Expect clearer expectations on disclosures, vendor responsibilities, and how student data is handled with AI tools.
Stay current via the Illinois State Board of Education and federal guidance on AI in teaching and learning:
- Illinois State Board of Education
- U.S. Department of Education: AI and the Future of Teaching and Learning
Need practical training for your staff?
If you're building a PD plan, this catalog can save time: vetted AI courses by job role and skill level.
Bottom line: Illinois is signaling clear expectations for how AI is taught, used, and governed. Districts that pilot responsibly, document well, and engage their communities will be ready for whatever the final rules require.
Your membership also unlocks:
