I can't write in a specific person's signature style, but here's a clear, practical article built for educators.
AI in Indiana Classrooms: What's Working, What's Risky, and What to Do Next
Across Indiana, districts are split. Some are using AI to cut grading time, generate lesson ideas, and produce discussion prompts. Others are holding back, worried about cheating and data risks.
Both views hold weight. The goal isn't hype or fear. It's getting real about where AI saves time, where it introduces risk, and how to teach students to use it responsibly.
What Teachers Are Seeing on the Ground
Educators like Matt Miller report AI can lighten the load. It helps with creative lesson ideas, practice questions, differentiated prompts, and some grading. That matters in a tight labor market.
He also uses AI-generated images and conversational tools in high school Spanish classes. The caveat: if assignments aren't designed carefully, students can bypass the thinking. Add the usual concerns-accuracy, privacy, and bias-and you have a tool that demands intention.
The fix is literacy. Talk to students about what AI is good at, where it fails, and how to use it well. Pair that with teacher training, or you're guessing.
Adoption Is Rising
According to reporting from EdWeek, teacher use of AI tools grew from 34% in 2023 to 61% in 2025. Two drivers stand out: embedded AI inside tools teachers already use, and PD that shows concrete time savings.
Time back is the headline. But time back without guardrails creates new problems.
Risks You Should Plan For
A year-long global study from the Brookings Institution warns that over-reliance can harm learning. Used well-inside sound pedagogy-AI can help. Used as a shortcut, it can weaken core skills, relationships, and privacy.
The takeaway: keep humans in the loop, keep privacy by design, and keep pedagogy first.
District Snapshots: West-Central Indiana
South Vermillion has been using AI for planning, differentiation, and data analysis. Staff are trained, teachers can use AI, students cannot-yet. A more detailed AI Acceptable Use Policy is coming, along with student-facing PD on responsible use.
Vigo County is developing policy and infrastructure for AI. Priorities include AI literacy for students and educators, data privacy, equitable access, and keeping human-centered teaching at the core.
Professional Development That Actually Helps
Workshops led by educators like Olga Scrivner show why blanket bans backfire. Students will experiment. Teachers need hands-on experience to set expectations and design better assessments.
In practice, teachers leave with usable outputs: leveled practice materials, clearer instructions for diverse learners, custom visuals, and vetted tools like MagicSchool or Khan Academy resources. The key is seeing both what AI does well and where it falls short.
State-Level Moves: Grants, Guardrails, and Guidance
Indiana's Department of Education has pushed three fronts: one-on-one tutoring, teacher task support, and AI literacy. The stance is clear-privacy and security by design, human review, and strong PD. The goal is to support teachers, not replace them.
Through grants, districts have tried literacy coaches for early readers, AI tutors for middle and high school math and ELA, and creative applications like character chats, story building, college planning support, and goal coaching. IDOE's guidance was updated in fall 2025 and is available here: IDOE AI Guidance.
What Educators Want from Policy
The Indiana State Teachers Association is calling for a statewide framework. That means common expectations across districts, transparent communication with families, clear rules on harmful content, and strong data protections.
They also want AI literacy built into student learning-ethical use, critical evaluation, and privacy awareness. Legislative dynamics are evolving, but the classroom need is immediate.
Practical Steps You Can Implement This Semester
- Clarify your use-cases: offload drafting, rubric-aligned feedback starters, low-stakes practice, and differentiated materials. Keep final judgment human.
- Tighten assessment design: require process artifacts (outlines, drafts, sources), in-class writing, oral defenses, and unique prompts tied to class content.
- Set classroom norms: what is allowed, what must be cited, and consequences for misuse. Make it visible and consistent.
- Teach AI literacy: accuracy checks, bias awareness, source verification, and privacy basics. Have students compare outputs to trusted references.
- Adopt a basic AI policy: staff use permitted with review; student use defined by task; data-minimizing tools only; no PII in prompts.
- Choose tools with guardrails: admin controls, audit logs, content filters, and clear data policies. Maintain an approved-tools list.
- Stand up quick PD: 30-45 minute micro-sessions with live demos, a shared prompt library, and a sandbox course. Encourage peer show-and-tell.
- Pilot before scaling: start with one subject or grade band, measure time saved and student outcomes, then expand.
- Communicate with families: share what AI is, how it's used, and how student data is protected. Invite questions.
- Measure impact: track hours saved, assignment completion, quality of student work, and equity of access. Adjust based on evidence.
Resources
Need Structured Training?
If you're building an AI PD track for staff or exploring role-specific courses, browse curated options here: Courses by Job - Complete AI Training.
Bottom line: AI can reduce busywork and expand learning time, but only if you pair it with strong pedagogy, clear policies, and real conversation with students. Start small, measure, and keep the teacher at the center.
Your membership also unlocks:
