Insurance Customers Are Skeptical About AI - Here's How Carriers Can Earn Their Trust
Survey data shows a clear trust gap. While consumers are warming up to AI, 68% believe insurers get most or all of the benefits. Only 26% think the value is shared equally.
People are fine with AI handling small, routine tasks. They draw a hard line at high-stakes decisions like pricing and claims outcomes. If you build AI without proving customer value, you'll feel it in complaints, reopens, and churn.
Where Customers Are Comfortable
- Automated claim status updates: 24%
- Billing management: 23%
- Basic customer service questions: 21%
Translation: convenience is welcome. Keep AI close to notifications, self-service, and speed.
Where Trust Breaks
- Processing claims: 47% are somewhat or very uncomfortable
- Fully using AI to price policies: only 15% support this
- Policy pricing limits: 33% want strict limits until bias risks are addressed; another 30% want partial use with strong safeguards (fairness, explainability, compliance)
Customers accept automation until it affects money, fairness, or accountability. That's your boundary.
What This Means for Carriers
AI must create visible, personal value: faster answers, fewer hassles, clearer decisions. And it must be controlled: auditable models, human oversight, transparent explanations.
If you can't explain it in plain language, don't deploy it in pricing or claims decisions. Start narrow, prove outcomes, then expand.
A Practical AI Playbook for Insurance Teams
- Prioritize customer-first use cases. Claims status, FNOL intake, document extraction, fraud flagging (as signals, not verdicts), payment scheduling.
- Keep humans on the hook for high-impact calls. AI suggests; adjusters and underwriters decide. Log overrides and learn from them.
- Governance aligned to trusted standards. Use a risk-based approach with controls for bias, explainability, privacy, and security. See the NIST AI Risk Management Framework: NIST AI RMF.
- Pricing: assistive, not autonomous. Run pre-deployment bias tests, impact analysis by segment, stability checks, and reason codes. File clear documentation with regulators. Offer a human review path.
- Claims: triage and documentation first. Use AI to classify, extract, and estimate. Require adjuster review for liability, coverage, causation, and high severities. Log every AI influence in the claim record.
- Transparency by design. Disclose where AI is used, how it helps, and how to get a human. Provide concise explanations for rating factors and adverse actions.
- Measurement that matters. Track complaint ratios, re-open rates, time-to-settle, indemnity leakage, fairness metrics, appeal outcomes, and opt-out rates. Publish improvements customers can feel.
- Vendor discipline. Demand model cards, training data summaries, bias/fairness testing, monitoring hooks, and audit rights from third parties.
- Train your people. Give frontline teams simple scripts, escalation rules, and scenarios. Build literacy for product, claims, compliance, and actuarial.
Plain-Language Copy You Can Use With Customers
- What we automate: updates, forms, and lookups to save you time.
- What we don't automate: final decisions about your coverage, claim responsibility, or price without human oversight.
- Your options: you can ask for a human at any point and request an explanation of any decision that affects your policy or claim.
- How we keep it fair: we test our systems for bias, audit them regularly, and follow strict standards for accuracy and privacy.
Rollout Checklist Before You Ship an AI Feature
- Clear customer benefit you can state in one sentence
- Human-in-the-loop defined for high-impact outcomes
- Bias, stability, and sensitivity tests passed with thresholds
- Monitoring, alerts, and a documented rollback plan
- Plain-language disclosures and an appeals path
- Legal, compliance, and model risk sign-offs recorded
- Pilot with a small segment; compare results to control
How to Communicate Results
Don't promise "AI will lower your rate." Promise specifics you can prove. For example: "We cut average claim status wait time by 38% and reduced re-keys by 62%, which means fewer delays and faster payouts."
Share actual improvements, even if they're small. Credibility compounds.
Bottom Line
Consumers are open to AI for convenience. They're skeptical about AI for judgment. Earn trust by keeping automation where it helps most, proving fairness where it matters, and showing real benefits in plain English.
If you're building internal skills for underwriting, claims, or ops teams, you can explore structured AI upskilling by job role here: Complete AI Training - Courses by Job.
Your membership also unlocks:
