Insurance's gen AI reckoning: prove ROI or pause
After years of pilots and hype, the question is blunt: where is the return on generative AI investment, and when does it show up? Evidence from other sectors has cooled expectations, with one study suggesting most firms still haven't measured real ROI from AI. Insurance may fare better, but only if teams stop chasing "silver bullets" and tie AI to specific operational pain.
Where insurers are seeing early returns
The clearest gains are showing up in efficiency, not headline-grabbing reinvention. Think faster quotes, tighter renewals, shorter claims cycles and higher employee throughput.
- Brokers and agencies: renewals, policy comparisons, client communication, and document processing. Small, focused workflows with direct financial impact.
- Carriers: underwriting support, claims triage, fraud detection, pricing optimization and customer service. Generative AI is often layered onto existing ML to speed decisions rather than replace them.
Patent activity matches those priorities. A small group of US P&C carriers dominates AI filings, with a heavy focus on claims automation, telematics and customer service. Since 2023, generative AI surged from a tiny fraction of filings to nearly a third, especially in claims and customer-facing processes.
Brokers vs. carriers: different bets, different clocks
- Brokers: smaller, tactical deployments that help staff work faster and retain clients. Lower cost, quicker wins, easier to justify. Gains are incremental.
- Carriers: bigger, longer-cycle programs that touch underwriting, pricing and claims. Larger upside with greater execution risk and longer timelines.
Why ROI is still hard to pin down
The "I" in ROI is fuzzy. Costs swing across cloud compute, data engineering, vendor licenses and change management. That uncertainty clouds payback math and expectations, much like the early web era when the value of a website wasn't obvious yet.
Measure at the use-case level
Insurers are moving from "Is AI worth it?" to "Did this use case reduce handling time, improve retention, cut errors or increase throughput?" That's where the math is clean. Improve renewals by a fraction and the uplift shows on the page.
One global claims firm has seen early gains by applying gen AI to targeted steps of the claims journey. The CEO's approach is to measure time saved and scale what sticks: shave five to twenty minutes for adjusters across thousands of claims, and productivity-and profitability-improves.
Timelines and dependencies you should expect
Across industries, most leaders now expect AI payback to land in two to four years, not within the typical seven to twelve months seen in standard IT projects. Only a small minority report returns inside a year.
AI rarely delivers value in isolation. Benefits ride alongside data clean-up, process redesign and workforce reskilling, which makes attribution messy. In insurance, legacy systems and fragmented data amplify that challenge.
Reset expectations: chat isn't your operating model
Market jitters and big-tech spending have stirred talk of an AI bubble. A more useful view for operators: this is a correction in expectations. Chat interfaces are visible and intuitive, but they're just one piece of the workflow.
If you expect a chatbot to fix claims end-to-end, you'll be let down. The gains come from a series of small, connected improvements across intake, triage, documentation, adjudication and communication-measured and integrated.
A practical playbook for insurers
- Pick 3-5 use cases with clear P&L tie-ins: renewals uplift, quote turnaround, claim cycle time, FNOL accuracy, subrogation recovery.
- Define the unit of value: minutes per task, basis points of retention, days in cycle time, percentage of straight-through processing, error rates.
- Baseline and instrument: log current metrics before deployment; set confidence intervals and sample sizes for A/B tests.
- Model the full cost: cloud/compute, data engineering, licenses, integration, change management, QA, model monitoring. Cap per-transaction costs.
- Data readiness first: map sources, fix quality issues, enforce PII controls, catalog prompts/artifacts, and set retention rules.
- Human-in-the-loop by default: define review checkpoints, exception routes and escalation paths; record decisions for audit.
- Ship in sprints: 6-8 week cycles with "kill/scale" gates. If KPIs miss two cycles in a row, cut or rethink.
- Integrate into core systems: embed into policy, claims and CRM workflows; avoid stranded tools that live in a separate chat window.
- Upskill the front line: short, role-based training for adjusters, underwriters and CSRs; update incentives to reward adoption.
- Stage your bets: productivity now; more autonomous "agentic" use cases as your data, controls and trust mature.
What "good ROI" looks like in insurance
- Renewals: a 1-2% lift on a mid-market book at typical commission rates can cover a year of AI tooling fast. Track uplift at the account level.
- Claims: cut average handle time by minutes, not hours, across large volumes. Measure both cycle time and indemnity accuracy.
- Underwriting: reduce quote prep by minutes per submission; increase hit ratio by better prioritization. Watch loss ratio impact over time.
- Fraud: triage more effectively, elevate precision in referrals, and limit false positives that drain adjuster time.
Agentic AI: proceed, but don't bet the farm
Fully autonomous multi-step systems are promising, especially for complex workflows like subrogation and multiparty claims. Early ROI is limited today, but many expect returns within three to five years. Keep pilots small, use guardrails, and require human sign-off where liability is high.
The bottom line
AI won't fix broken processes by itself. It amplifies the quality of your data, decisions and discipline. The winners will pair well-governed data with targeted use cases and a culture that adopts new ways of working.
Job impacts are real. So are the opportunities. With measured bets and clean metrics, insurance can outperform the broad-market ROI trend-and do it without the hype.
Useful sources
- MIT analysis on why AI ROI is often elusive
- Deloitte research on AI investment timelines and returns
Upskilling your team
If you need structured, role-based AI training for underwriting, claims and operations teams, explore curated options by job at Complete AI Training.
Your membership also unlocks:
