Build the Right Environment for Trustworthy AI in Japan
Generative AI is now a core infrastructure issue-tied to national strength, economic security, and the daily lives of citizens. A new proposal calls for Japan to create a reliable environment for AI development and use, centered on autonomy, transparency, and alignment with domestic values.
For IT and development leaders, this translates into one priority: reduce overreliance on opaque, foreign-built models and build Japan-first systems that reflect local ethics, language, and context-without sacrificing performance or safety.
Where Japan Stands
U.S. and China lead model performance rankings, with OpenAI and DeepSeek setting the pace. Japan has momentum-NTT and SoftBank are building domestic models, while Preferred Networks and NICT are developing systems using AIST compute-but foreign models still dominate usage inside Japan.
That dominance brings risk. Model "contents" are often unclear, and outputs can reflect the norms of the country of origin. That includes subtle ideological lean, which matters for education and public information. The proposal argues for government-led development of models grounded in Japanese ethics and data.
Data, Cost, and National Interest
Japan's annual deficit for digital services exceeds ¥6 trillion. Greater adoption of Japan-made models could reduce outbound payments and keep value inside the country. The proposal highlights a simple lever: use high-quality Japanese-language data and expand lawful access to accurate domestic datasets.
The goal is straight: models that actually understand Japan-its language nuances, laws, institutions, and social norms.
A Circle of Trustworthy AI Models
The proposal outlines an international network of "trustworthy AI models" built and recognized by participating nations (e.g., the U.K., France, India, South Korea). When a model queries another country in the network, it can pull from a system aligned to that country's characteristics, reducing misinformation and improving relevance.
This effort can align with the G7's Hiroshima AI Process, which established shared rules for generative AI. See the G7's announcement for context: G7 Hiroshima AI Process.
Social and Educational Risks Require Early Action
The proposal flags job losses and inequality as near-term risks. U.S. data since late 2022 shows persistent declines in roles tied to document creation, programming, and market research-with market research employment down by as much as 23 percentage points. Expect similar pressure in Japan within a few years.
Education also needs guardrails. Overuse of generative tools can weaken thinking skills, especially during compulsory education. The proposal urges careful use in schools, with emphasis on critical thinking and human-led evaluation.
What Government Should Do Next
- Fund domestic base models: Prioritize multilingual (JP-first) training, safety tuning, and long-context capability.
- Build lawful data access: Streamline frameworks for public datasets, archives, and industry corpora with strong privacy controls.
- Require transparency: Model cards, safety specs, evaluation results, training data provenance, and content origin labeling.
- Procure local models: Preference for Japan-made systems in public sector deployments where feasible.
- Support compute: Expand national compute (e.g., through AIST-scale resources) and credits for startups and academia.
- Create a trust network: Use the Hiroshima AI Process "Friends Group" to federate evaluations and cross-recognition.
- Preempt labor shocks: Retraining subsidies, job transition programs, and incentives for AI-augmented roles.
- Protect schools: Clear classroom policies, age-appropriate usage, detection/attribution tools, and teacher training.
What IT and Development Teams Can Do Now
- Audit your stack: Inventory every model, endpoint, and dataset. Map where foreign services are embedded and why.
- Prioritize JP-first performance: For Japan-facing products, evaluate domestic or Japan-tuned models in head-to-head tests (accuracy, latency, cost, safety).
- Control for bias and drift: Establish eval suites in Japanese (factuality, toxicity, stereotype checks, policy compliance) with regression tracking per release.
- Strengthen data pipelines: Curate high-quality Japanese corpora; add retrieval with vetted sources (laws, standards, public datasets). Log and review citations.
- Institutionalize guardrails: Policy-aware prompts, content filters, rate limits, secure contexts, and human review for high-risk actions.
- Lock down PII: Default to local processing for sensitive data; use KMS, field-level encryption, and differential privacy where suitable.
- Negotiate IP and residency: Contract for data non-retention, onshore inference, reproducible builds, and audit rights.
- Plan skills and roles: Upskill engineers in LLMOps, evaluation engineering, secure RAG, and safety tuning. Cross-train analysts for AI-augmented workflows.
- Track total cost: Measure TCO across inference, fine-tuning, evals, guardrails, and human oversight. Optimize with batching, caching, and model right-sizing.
Data Priorities for Japan-Built Models
- Legal and civic corpora: Statutes, case law, agency guidance, standards bodies, municipal resources.
- Domain depth: Manufacturing, healthcare, finance, logistics, and public services with high-quality Japanese documentation.
- Cultural/linguistic nuance: Politeness levels, idioms, honorifics, and regional expressions.
- Education datasets: Age-appropriate materials with safety labels for classroom use.
Key Metrics to Watch
- Accuracy and safety in Japanese: Benchmarks by task and industry, tracked over time.
- Data residency and retention: Evidence of onshore processing, zero-retain settings verified.
- Cost per request and per workflow: Compare domestic vs. foreign models under real traffic.
- Human oversight load: Review time, escalation rates, and incident counts.
Bottom Line
Japan needs AI that reflects its values, language, and economic interests. That means building domestic systems, improving access to quality Japanese data, and linking up with trusted partners under common rules.
If you build or buy AI in Japan, start shifting your stack now-evaluate local models, tighten governance, and invest in skills so your teams stay effective as the tech moves forward.
Skill Up (Optional)
For hands-on training and role-based learning paths, explore: AI courses by job and AI certification for coding.
Your membership also unlocks:
