Did Growing Legal and AI Challenges Just Shift CoStar Group's Investment Narrative?
At the Stephens Annual Investment Conference on November 20, 2025, CoStar Group put CFO Christian M. Lown and Head of Investor Relations Richard Simonelli in front of investors who wanted clarity on three fronts: litigation, integration of recent acquisitions, and heavy AI spend. Management kept the long-term digital leadership message intact, but the near-term picture now looks more dependent on how those legal and competitive issues play out.
Q3 results showed strong year-over-year sales growth alongside a net loss as operating expenses climbed with product expansion and legal activity. Homes.com remains the primary growth lever. At the same time, a recent uptick in insider selling has drawn attention and added to short-term debate.
Why lawyers are now central to the CSGP thesis
For investors, the story used to be straightforward: spend aggressively, scale digital products, capture share. Today, legal outcomes and AI risk controls could move the timing-and possibly the size-of that payoff. If you support a deal team or sit in-house, your work may influence valuation more than usual over the next few quarters.
The legal docket: where risk concentrates
- Copyright litigation (headline claim in the billions): Expect intensive discovery on data ingestion, scraping practices, and AI training. Core issues likely include ownership, authorization, fair use arguments, and potential injunctive relief. Settlement economics vs. precedent risk is a key board-level decision.
- AI data provenance and outputs: Inventory datasets and consents, confirm license scopes, and tighten indemnities with model vendors. Watch for claims tied to removal or alteration of copyright management information (17 U.S.C. §1202) and monitor outputs to limit material that could be seen as derivative of protected works.
- Competition and acquisition integration: Exclusive arrangements, data access, and ad platform conduct can trigger scrutiny. Keep an eye on DOJ/FTC posture, potential behavioral remedies, and burdens that might affect Homes.com momentum.
- Access and scraping disputes: Strengthen terms of use, authentication controls, and API rate policies. Evaluate exposure under computer access and trespass theories, especially where rivals or aggregators are involved.
- Employment, contractors, and IP assignment: Clarify ownership of AI-assisted contributions, confidentiality boundaries, and third-party tool usage. Update policies so employees know what tools are approved and what logs are retained.
- Discovery and recordkeeping for AI systems: Preserve model versions, training snapshots, prompts, and evaluation notes. Early protocol agreements can contain cost and limit disputes.
Financial context investors will care about
CoStar's outlook calls for about $4.7 billion in revenue and roughly $866.2 million in earnings by 2028, implying near 16.9% annual revenue growth and an earnings increase of about $762 million from the current $104.2 million baseline. A scenario-based valuation points to a fair value near $91.94-about 36% above the referenced market price at the time of the estimate.
Community views are split: recent fair values cited ranged from about $67.87 to $139.70. Translation for legal teams: execution is still credited, but case outcomes and integration discipline could swing multiples.
What in-house and outside counsel can do now
- Map legal risk to revenue drivers. Tie each major matter to Homes.com growth, sales execution, and ad monetization to quantify potential impact.
- Run settlement vs. litigation trees. Include injunctive scenarios and discovery costs, not just damages bands.
- Tighten AI governance. Catalog datasets, licenses, vendor indemnities, model change logs, and removal procedures for flagged content.
- Pressure-test integration plans. Validate exclusivity clauses, data-sharing terms, and advertising conduct against current agency thinking.
- Upgrade retention and eDiscovery for AI. Preserve model artifacts and prompt logs with clear custodians and legal holds.
- Refresh public disclosures. Ensure risk factors and MD&A language reflect actual exposure and control maturity.
Questions to ask management this quarter
- Where do litigation timelines intersect with product milestones for Homes.com and ad platform releases?
- Which datasets and licenses are most likely to be challenged, and what fallback options are in place?
- What triggers a settlement posture shift, and what non-monetary terms would be acceptable?
- How are access/scraping controls enforced and audited with partners and competitors?
- What discovery budget and preservation plan exist for AI systems across the enterprise?
- How are integration covenants monitored to avoid competition issues while keeping revenue on track?
Bottom line
The long-term thesis hasn't collapsed, but the path is more legal-heavy than before. If CoStar resolves key disputes without injunctions and keeps AI/data controls tight, the 2028 targets look more reachable. If not, legal outcomes could be the main swing factor in both margins and valuation.
Further reading
This commentary is for general information only and is not legal or investment advice.
Your membership also unlocks:
