Lloyd's Lab names 12 companies for 15th cohort, AI in focus

AI anchors Lloyd's Lab's 15th cohort, with tools for underwriting, pricing, claims, and ops. Carriers should pilot with clear metrics strong controls, and scale only on proven lift.

Categorized in: AI News Insurance
Published on: Sep 12, 2025
Lloyd's Lab names 12 companies for 15th cohort, AI in focus

Lloyd's Lab's 15th cohort leans into AI

Lloyd's has selected 12 companies for the 15th Lloyd's Lab cohort, with a strong emphasis on AI-driven propositions. The signal is clear: the market wants measurable gains in underwriting, claims, and operations, not theory.

For insurance leaders, this is a prompt to pressure-test your AI roadmap. The winners will be those who pair experimentation with disciplined governance, data controls, and clear commercial outcomes.

Why this matters for carriers, brokers, and MGAs

  • Better risk selection: AI triage and enrichment can lift hit ratios and reduce loss ratio volatility.
  • Pricing precision: Faster ingestion of exposure data and third-party signals supports more consistent pricing.
  • Operational speed: Document ingestion, bordereaux processing, and sanctions screening can be automated and audited.
  • Claims efficiency: Intelligent FNOL, fraud flags, and severity scoring shorten cycle times without compromising control.
  • Cyber and specialty growth: New models can improve accumulation views and coverage clarity in fast-moving lines.

Expected focus areas in this cohort

  • Underwriting co-pilots: Submission parsing, appetite checks, and structured summary outputs for referrals.
  • Policy and wording: Drafting assistance, clause comparison, and impact analysis for endorsements and exclusions.
  • Exposure management: Near-real-time signals for nat cat, political violence, marine and cargo routing, and climate-related perils.
  • Claims and fraud: Image/text analytics, subrogation spotting, and reserve support with auditable rationale.
  • Cyber risk: External attack-surface intelligence and scenario modeling for portfolio-level controls.
  • Operations: Bordereaux automation, capacity reporting, and multi-carrier data standardization.

90-day playbook to engage with AI solutions

  • Define 3 use cases: one for growth (e.g., submission triage), one for efficiency (e.g., bordereaux), one for risk control (e.g., sanctions screening).
  • Set success metrics: conversion uplift, quote turnaround time, leakage reduction, and control evidence (audit logs, explanations).
  • Run a narrow pilot: limited users, limited products, read-only data first; expand access after control checks pass.
  • Validate data and models: confirm data provenance, PII treatment, and model update cadence; establish rollback plans.
  • Decide go/no-go: require quantified lift, policy compliance, and positive user feedback before scaling.

Vendor due diligence questions that save time

  • Data provenance: What sources, licenses, and retention policies are in place? Is training on client data optional and segregated?
  • Security and privacy: SOC 2/ISO 27001 status, encryption in transit/at rest, secrets management, and pen-test frequency.
  • Explainability: How are recommendations explained for audit? Can you export rationale and input artefacts?
  • Model risk: Versioning, monitoring for drift, bias testing, and approval workflows for model changes.
  • Controls for genAI: Prompt injection defenses, content filters, redaction of sensitive data, and human-in-the-loop checkpoints.
  • Interoperability: APIs, data formats, and ability to integrate with policy admin, rating, and claims systems.
  • Commercials: Usage-based or seat-based pricing, exit terms, and data deletion on termination.

Risk and compliance guardrails

  • Privacy: Minimize PII, apply redaction, and log access; align with applicable guidance from regulators.
  • Fairness: Test for disparate impact; document mitigation steps and residual risk.
  • Auditability: Preserve prompts, inputs, outputs, and model versions; enable replay for file reviews.
  • Human oversight: Define decision rights-what AI can suggest vs. what only a human can approve.
  • Third-party risk: Map vendor dependencies and concentration risk; maintain a fallback plan.

Implications for the London market

The emphasis on AI suggests a push to compress cycle times without losing underwriting discipline. Expect faster triage on complex risks, better portfolio steering in volatile classes, and more consistent wording governance across facilities and binders.

For leaders, the move now is to convert pilots into scaled, compliant workflows. The firms that ship controlled automation first will set the service standard others must match.

Next steps and resources

AI is moving from experiments to accountable tooling. Set clear targets, enforce controls, and ship improvements your underwriters and clients can feel this quarter.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)