Government to apply AI to resident feedback: what public servants need to know
The government has confirmed it will use artificial intelligence to help staff handle enquiries, opinions, and complaints from residents. The Public Administration and Civil Service Bureau (SAFP) outlined the plan in a reply to a written interpellation by lawmaker Sharon Loi I Weng, following earlier remarks from Secretary for Administration and Justice Wong Sio Chak about a unified feedback platform supported by big data models and AI.
The goal is straightforward: one simple platform, cleaner standards, faster replies. The reform targets three areas-legal rules, technology and workflow, and performance management-so departments work from the same playbook and residents get timely, traceable responses.
The reform in three parts
- Unified rules and deadlines: Standard response procedures for all public entities, clearer responsibilities, and improved reply timelines. This reduces ambiguity and sets service-level expectations across the board.
- Single AI-enabled platform: A standardized mechanism to receive, route, and track opinions and complaints across departments. AI will assist intake and case handling, enable seamless transfers, and support interdepartmental coordination so cases don't stall between entities.
- Performance and accountability: Time-to-resolution and resident satisfaction will count in entity evaluations. The intent is to keep teams focused on public needs, service quality, and measurable outcomes.
What this means for your department
Expect tighter service standards and shared workflows. The platform becomes the default path for resident input, regardless of channel, with end-to-end case tracking.
- Assign ownership: Name a complaints/opinions lead and a backup per unit. Clarify escalation rules for delays and complex cases.
- Standardize categories and templates: Map issue types, response templates, and evidence requirements so AI-assisted triage is accurate from day one.
- Improve data quality: Use consistent metadata (topic, location, urgency, language) to boost routing and analytics.
- Train frontline staff: Short sessions on AI-assisted intake, summarization, and tone guidelines will save time and reduce rework.
- Protect privacy and fairness: Set guardrails for personal data, sensitive topics, and edge cases that require human judgment.
- Track the right KPIs: Monitor first-response time, resolution time, re-open rates, and satisfaction. Review weekly, not yearly.
Implementation notes
Start simple, iterate fast, and keep humans in the loop for sensitive or ambiguous cases. The SAFP's approach favors consistency without slowing down service.
- Pilot where volume is highest: Select 2-3 common categories to validate routing accuracy and SLAs before scaling.
- Close the loop: Send clear outcomes to residents, ask for quick satisfaction input, and feed that data back into process improvements.
- Design for accessibility: Support multiple languages and channels, and ensure mobile-friendly submission and tracking.
- Audit regularly: Review misrouted cases and AI suggestions, then refine categories, prompts, and templates.
Lawmaker Sharon Loi I Weng's interpellation prompted a detailed response that is now on the legislature's website. The direction is set: unified standards, a single AI-enabled platform, and performance metrics that reward timely, people-first service.
Further reading and practical resources
- OECD: AI in the public sector
- ISO 10002: Guidelines for complaints handling
- Complete AI Training: Courses by job (useful for public service teams)
Your membership also unlocks:
