Much More Than Common Core - Artificial Intelligence: How to Use AI to Amplify (Not Hinder) Learning
The "Sorcerer's Apprentice" gets it right: outsource the work and you skip the skill-building. AI makes the same bargain tempting in class. If students let the model write and think for them, the practice that grows their minds disappears.
But shutting the door on AI won't prepare them for work or life. The move is to teach students to think with AI, not have AI think for them.
- Researchers reported major drops in neural activity and retention when students used AI to write for them.
- Students need structured practice that develops original thinking, not shortcuts that erase it.
- The original goal for computers was "intelligence amplification" (IA): humans thinking better with machines, not offloading thought to them.
The risk of using AI as a crutch
When learners hand tough cognitive work to a model, their own neural engagement falls. That's the headline from recent research on AI-assisted writing. Over time, that dependence dulls the very abilities schools aim to build: analysis, synthesis, and creative problem solving.
At the same time, workplaces are automating routine tasks. Students who only consume AI outputs won't stand out. Students who can question, direct, and extend AI will.
Set your intention: from production to creative thinking
Schools were built for standardization. That mindset optimizes for compliance and output. It doesn't grow curiosity or original thought.
A better north star is IA-intelligence amplification. J. C. R. Licklider proposed it in 1960: use computers to help humans think, not to replace their thinking. See Man-Computer Symbiosis for the core idea.
Bring that lens to AI in class. Ask: Will this use of AI deepen student thinking, or do the thinking for them?
What "amplify with AI" looks like
Computers run on patterns. Humans bring feelings, lived experience, and non-linear associations. The sweet spot is using AI to surface connections students wouldn't see alone-then pushing them to test, refine, and make personal meaning.
Look for "surprise" moments. When a model's output challenges a student's mental model, that jolt can fuel curiosity. Your job is to catch it, slow down, and turn it into deeper inquiry.
Classroom routines that grow thinkers (with AI)
1) Connection prompts
- Have students ask AI: "Find 3 surprising connections between [unit concept] and [my interest: skateboarding/gaming/cooking]."
- Students pick the most interesting link, verify it with credible sources, and explain what it adds to their understanding.
2) Surprise capture
- Model curiosity. When a student teaches you something new, write it on a Post-it and put it on a visible "Surprises" board.
- Turn a surprise into a live prompt. Discuss the output, what's useful, what's off, and what to investigate next.
3) Argue with the model
- Students prompt AI for a claim on a topic, then write a rebuttal using course content and lived experience.
- They ask AI to critique their rebuttal and revise again. Submit both drafts with a short reflection on what changed.
4) Outline first, AI second
- No AI until a student drafts a thesis and outline. After that, AI can suggest counterarguments, examples, and structure fixes.
- Students label what came from AI, what they kept, and why.
5) Translation for clarity
- Use AI to translate dense texts into simpler language without losing meaning.
- Students compare versions and annotate what was lost or gained.
6) Perspective shift
- Prompt: "Explain [concept] from the viewpoint of a city planner/paramedic/parent."
- Students evaluate which perspective clarified the concept and how it reframes decisions.
Guardrails that protect thinking
- AI-free zones: first brainstorms, thesis statements, problem setups, and initial data interpretations.
- AI as a tool, not an author: allow it for idea expansion, examples, organization checks, and feedback on clarity.
- Source and bias checks: require students to verify claims with credible sources and note model uncertainty.
- Process transparency: include prompts, outputs, and revision notes with final work.
- Assessment that resists copy-paste: oral defenses, whiteboard walkthroughs, personal examples, and local case studies.
What to look for as a teacher
- Evidence of surprise leading to inquiry ("I thought X, AI suggested Y, so I tested Z").
- Clear separation between AI-generated ideas and student reasoning.
- Improvement across drafts tied to feedback (human and AI).
- Use of course concepts to challenge or enrich AI outputs.
Quick start plan (this week)
- Pick one routine above and run it for 20 minutes, start to finish.
- Add an AI section to your rubric: originality, verification, reflection on model bias/limits.
- Create a class "Prompt Log." Share high-quality prompts and what made them work.
- End each activity with a 90-second reflection: "What surprised you? What will you try next time?"
Why this works
Students keep the hard parts of thinking: framing problems, judging quality, and making meaning. AI supports by widening the search space and offering feedback on demand.
Done well, this approach raises engagement, deepens understanding, and builds the habits employers actually want: curiosity, critique, and creativity.
If you want structured ways to build these skills by role, see our curated AI courses by job.
Your membership also unlocks:
