Maximus Embraces AI to Improve Benefit Accuracy Before the 2027 Deadline
State agencies are under new pressure. Starting in 2027, federal funding will be linked more directly to the accuracy of benefit issuances, with programs like SNAP under the microscope.
Maximus is moving early with a predictive analytics tool called the Accuracy Assistant. The goal is simple: flag likely errors before cases are finalized, cut improper payments, and protect funding.
Why it matters for government leaders
Error rates are no longer a back-office statistic-they affect budgets, public trust, and program stability. States that act now will have a cleaner path to compliance, better audit readiness, and fewer emergency fixes later.
Some states, including Arizona, are already modernizing social service systems. The shift in procurement is clear: executive sponsors want solutions that measurably move accuracy, timeliness, and dollars saved.
What Maximus is bringing to the table
The Accuracy Assistant uses predictive analytics to score application reviews and call out potential mistakes before a determination is made. Think targeted quality checks, fewer manual rework loops, and clearer audit trails.
If it performs as advertised, agencies could see fewer denials overturned, cleaner QC samples, and more consistent reviewer decisions-especially in high-volume caseloads.
What to watch in the next 12-18 months
- Contract renewals and extensions: Do AI-enabled offerings help lock in longer mandates for social program administration?
- Regulatory momentum: Are states accelerating modernization to prepare for 2027 accuracy-linked funding?
- Operational efficiency: Do reductions in manual reviews and rework show up as better margins and faster case processing?
- Large-state tenders: Awards in high-population states will signal whether Maximus can outpace bigger incumbents.
Practical steps for agencies right now
- Map your error drivers: Use QC data to pinpoint where errors originate (verification, documentation, eligibility rules, adjudication).
- Pilot, then scale: Start with one program, one region, or one case type. Compare pre/post accuracy and timeliness.
- Set threshold rules: Define when AI flags require human review, escalation, or automated checks.
- Integrate with QC: Feed AI flags into sampling and corrective action plans so gains show up in official metrics.
- Train reviewers: Teach staff how to read model signals, verify evidence, and document decisions for audits.
Procurement checklist
- Evidence of impact: Ask for measured reductions in payment error rates and rework from pilots or similar programs.
- Auditability: Require clear explanations for each flag and a complete decision log.
- Rule updates: Confirm the tool can keep pace with policy changes without long vendor cycles.
- Data controls: Validate encryption, access controls, retention, and segregation of PII.
- Bias testing: Request documented fairness testing and monitoring across demographic groups.
- Interoperability: Ensure APIs work with your case management, imaging, and eligibility systems.
- Total cost of ownership: Price the pilot, rollout, support, and change management-not just licenses.
Risk and governance guardrails
- Human-in-the-loop: Keep final decisions with trained staff. Use AI as decision support, not a black box.
- Transparency: Document how flags are generated and what evidence was reviewed.
- Continuous monitoring: Track drift, false positives, and downstream appeals.
- Equity checks: Review model performance by population segment. Build targeted corrections if disparities appear.
For policy and QC teams
Align AI signals to the same definitions used in audits and federal reporting. That keeps improvements visible where they matter-payment accuracy and case error rates.
For reference on SNAP quality control expectations, see USDA's program materials: SNAP Quality Control. Broader context on improper payments is available from GAO: Payment Integrity.
Investor angle (brief)
Market interest will focus on adoption within the current client base and wins in large states. Quarterly results and tender outcomes will signal whether Maximus's early move translates into share gains against firms like Accenture.
Bottom line
Accuracy is becoming a budget lever, not just a compliance metric. If Maximus's Accuracy Assistant helps state teams catch errors early and document decisions clearly, it will matter for both funding and service quality.
Start with pilots, tighten governance, and measure results against federal QC standards. The agencies that do this now will be ready for 2027.
Need to upskill your team on AI-enabled workflows?
Consider practical training for reviewers, analysts, and program managers: AI courses by job role.
Your membership also unlocks:
