Maxon risks 3D artists' fury with new AI "Digital Twin" tool
Maxon announced a new tool called Digital Twin, and the reaction from 3D artists has been harsh. The company teased a demo at CES 2026 but shared little detail about how it works or where it lives-Cinema 4D, ZBrush, or a separate app.
Digital Twin promises "marketing-ready" images by dropping product models into AI-generated backgrounds while auto-matching lighting, reflections, and perspective. The pitch: skip the studio shoot and still get accurate product visuals.
The backlash: why artists are pushing back
Maxon posted the news across channels, but it blew up on ZBrush's X account-with almost entirely negative responses. Artists say the company is prioritizing headline AI features over practical fixes they've been requesting for years.
Common threads: basic undo and subtool workflows still feel brittle, transparency about the AI model and training data is missing, and subscription fatigue is real. Some users say this confirms their choice to keep a perpetual license or move work to Blender.
Who is this really for?
ZBrush serves sculptors. Digital Twin reads like a tool for marketing teams who want fast assets without booking a studio or hiring specialists. That mirrors Adobe's play: ship AI that helps marketers produce content at scale, even if artists aren't thrilled.
If you want a reference point, Adobe's Firefly has taken this route-baked into workflows that lean toward speed and volume over craft. See Firefly's positioning.
What this means for working creatives
- Expect more "studio-free" product image pipelines. If your value is lighting, realism, and consistency-lean into what AI still struggles with: tricky materials, complex compositions, and art direction.
- Product teams will test this for quick campaigns. Offer a "hybrid" service: AI-assisted comps plus artist-led polish. Sell reliability, brand safety, and legal clarity.
- If you're in 3D: keep alternative pipelines ready. Blender, Houdini, and traditional photo sets are leverage in negotiations and timelines.
- Lock down contracts. Specify AI usage, training data requirements, model disclosures, and indemnity. Put revision caps on AI-first deliverables.
- Market yourself on taste, not tools. Tools get cheaper. Taste, direction, and problem-solving hold value.
Open questions Maxon needs to answer
- Where does Digital Twin live-ZBrush, Cinema 4D, Redshift, or a standalone?
- What AI model powers it, and what data was used to train it? Are there opt-outs for client assets?
- Rights and compliance: who owns outputs, and are there brand safety guarantees?
- Control: can artists lock lighting rigs, color management, and lens metadata for consistency across batches?
- Pricing: subscription add-on, token usage, or bundled? Is there an offline mode for sensitive work?
Practical next steps
- Set a POV for clients now. Write a one-pager: when AI is appropriate, when it isn't, and how you guarantee quality and rights.
- Build a sample workflow: 3D model → AI background → manual relight + reflection pass → final grade. Time it. Price it.
- Keep a competitive checklist: render speed, batch automation, color pipeline, and asset governance. Offer the option clients will trust.
The bottom line
Digital Twin might help marketers ship product visuals faster. The way it was announced, though, reads as "skip the artist," which explains the blowback.
If Maxon wants artists on board, it needs clarity on models, data, rights, and control. If you work in 3D, don't panic-get strategic. Offer the hybrid workflow, protect your IP, and package your taste as the difference.
If you're leveling up your AI workflow for creative work without losing quality, here's a curated starting point: AI courses by job.
Your membership also unlocks:
