UK lawmakers push AI stress tests for financial services
UK regulators are being urged to stop "wait and see" and start pressure-testing AI in finance. A cross-party committee says the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Bank of England (BoE) should run AI-specific stress tests to prepare firms for shocks triggered by automated systems.
The committee also wants the FCA to publish clear guidance by the end of 2026 on how consumer protection rules apply to AI and how much senior managers are expected to understand about the systems they oversee. "Based on the evidence I've seen, I do not feel confident that our financial system is prepared if there was a major AI-related incident and that is worrying," said committee chair Meg Hillier.
Why this matters for your firm
Adoption is already widespread: roughly three-quarters of UK financial firms use AI in core operations-from claims handling to credit decisions. The push toward agentic AI, which can take autonomous actions, raises exposure for retail customers and heightens model risk across the stack.
- Opaque credit outcomes and hard-to-explain decisions
- Exclusion of vulnerable customers through algorithmic tailoring
- Fraud and scams at machine scale
- Unregulated financial guidance via chatbots
Systemic risk is on the table
Experts warned the committee about concentration risk from heavy reliance on a handful of U.S. tech providers for AI and cloud. They also flagged that AI-driven trading could amplify herding-accelerating one-way moves and increasing the chance of a liquidity crunch.
Regulators' stance
The FCA said it will review the report and has previously signalled caution about AI-specific rules given the speed of change. The BoE said it has begun assessing AI-related risks and strengthening the system, and will consider the recommendations.
What to do now: a practical checklist for finance leaders
- Build an AI risk inventory: catalogue every model, use case, data source, and decision it influences.
- Run AI incident drills: rehearse model failure, prompt injection, data poisoning, and vendor outage scenarios.
- Independent validation: stress test models for bias, drift, adversarial inputs, and correlated behavior across models.
- Put humans back in the loop: require manual review for high-impact decisions and set hard guardrails for chatbots.
- Measure consumer outcomes continuously: monitor declines, complaints, and overrides by segment, not just aggregate KPIs.
- Tighten third-party controls: map model dependencies to cloud/AI vendors; define failover and exit plans.
- Control herding risk: simulate market scenarios where similar models react the same way; add diversification in strategies and data.
- Clarify accountability: document who signs off models and what they must understand; align with SMF responsibilities.
- Strengthen kill-switches: ensure rapid rollback, model versioning, and human escalation paths.
- Recordkeeping and explainability: keep data lineage, prompts, and decision logs to support audits and redress.
Timeline and governance
With guidance expected by end-2026, firms shouldn't wait. Treat AI governance like model risk plus conduct risk, with added focus on vendor concentration and operational resilience. Training senior managers on model mechanics, data risks, and failure modes will be essential for credible oversight.
The government has also tapped industry leaders to steer adoption, appointing Starling Bank CIO Harriet Rees and Lloyds Banking Group's Rohit Dhawan to advise on AI in financial services.
For context on the committee's work, see the UK Parliament's Treasury Committee. If you're updating your team's toolkit for AI in finance, this curated list may help: AI tools for finance.
Your membership also unlocks:
