AI's shaky week: what it means for government CIOs
A rough market week put AI vendors on notice. Big tech saw about $1.2 trillion erased from market caps. Then came an awkward "backstop" comment about government guarantees for AI infrastructure loans, followed by quick denials and walk-backs from OpenAI leadership. The question hanging over every public-sector tech plan: is this a bubble, and should you pull back?
The spending picture is intense. OpenAI leadership has talked up a $20B annualized revenue run rate alongside plans for enormous multi-year infrastructure investments, plus a fresh multibillion cloud deal. That scale naturally raises doubts about payback timelines. For government buyers, the takeaway is simple: assume volatility, design for resilience.
Is this the bubble pop? Not yet. But act like it could be.
Analysts are split. The consensus: don't panic, but get pragmatic. The tech won't vanish overnight, and even a major vendor stumble wouldn't be an extinction-level event. What should worry you most is the weak return on your own AI spend.
Staffing is part of the picture. Some organizations cut coders too fast. Treat AI as augmentation first, replacement second. We're already seeing a few rehires where the math didn't hold up.
Moves government CIOs can make this quarter
- Freeze net-new AI tools unless you can prove value from current ones. Tool sprawl kills ROI.
- Consolidate platforms. Standardize on one primary model provider and one backup. Limit overlapping features.
- Prove value with three use cases. Baseline before/after on cycle time, accuracy, and cost per task. No metrics, no money.
- Adopt a risk framework. Use the NIST AI Risk Management Framework for consistent controls and documentation.
- Renegotiate contracts. Push usage-based pricing, clear exit clauses, data portability, and model-switch rights without penalties.
- Build migration paths. Keep embeddings, prompts, and fine-tunes portable. Avoid vendor-locked vector databases and proprietary formats.
- Budget for volatility. Plan for compute costs to swing ±50%. Set hard monthly caps and throttles.
- Upskill instead of over-hiring. Train analysts and engineers as AI operators. Reward augmented output, not tool count.
- Tighten governance. Inventory every model, dataset, and prompt. Enforce human-in-the-loop for sensitive decisions and security reviews for every deployment.
- Track vendor health. Watch cash runway, dependency on subsidies, and concentration risk. Keep a continuity plan ready.
Procurement checkpoints before you sign anything
- 12-month payback with a clear measurement plan and owner.
- Total cost of ownership, not just token rates: storage, egress, evals, red-teaming, support.
- Data residency, retention, and fine-tune isolation in writing.
- FedRAMP/StateRAMP where applicable; independent security attestations updated annually.
- Evaluation harness using your real workloads; vendor-agnostic benchmarks.
- Incident response, audit logs, and model change notices baked into the SLA.
What if a major vendor stumbles?
Expect turbulence, not collapse. Diversification could even help the market by widening competition. Your job is to make a transition boring.
- Keep a hot-standby alternative (model or provider) tested quarterly.
- Store prompts, datasets, and vector indexes in portable formats.
- Use containerized inference or on-prem options for critical services.
- Set SLAs with financial penalties and a pre-approved exit path.
Policy angle: should government backstop AI loans?
The "backstop" talk lit up the week, then got walked back. For public money, the bar is high. Any intervention should be time-limited, transparent, competition-neutral, and tied to clear public outcomes like security, accessibility, and service quality.
Meanwhile, you already have guidance to anchor decisions: the AI Executive Order and the NIST AI RMF. Use them to justify pace, set guardrails, and defend procurement discipline. If a deal doesn't clear those standards, press pause.
For broader federal direction on safety and procurement, see the White House materials under the AI Executive Order 14110 here.
A simple 90-day plan
- Weeks 1-2: Inventory all AI projects and spending. Publish a live dashboard.
- Weeks 3-6: Freeze new tools. Run ROI sprints on three top use cases with baselines.
- Weeks 7-10: Consolidate vendors. Renegotiate contracts with exit and portability terms.
- Weeks 11-13: Push two use cases to production with clear KPIs and a rollback plan. Share results with leadership.
Upskilling beats tool sprawl
Tools change fast; skills compound. If you need structured paths by role, explore practical training and certifications to lift team output and reduce reliance on vendors.
Bottom line: treat this as a stress test, not a fire drill. Keep your stack lean, your data portable, and your metrics honest. If the market lurches, you'll still deliver services on time and on budget.
Your membership also unlocks:
