PR’s AI Originality Dilemma
AI offers undeniable convenience and efficiency, but is the PR industry ready to sacrifice its creativity for the sake of ease? This question is increasingly pressing as AI tools become more common in communications work.
Across marketing and communications sectors, conversations about AI often center on creativity, uniqueness, and the value of human insight. Despite widespread use, there’s no clear consensus or standard policy on how AI should be integrated ethically. Many firms, including some with established AI guidelines, are still defining what responsible AI use means in practice.
At the core, this debate boils down to originality. Historically, PR has upheld an anti-plagiarism stance, ensuring that campaigns and content reflect genuine, unique ideas crafted by the team. Inspiration is drawn widely, but final concepts must be authentic and defensible. This principle is now being tested by AI’s ability to generate content that may lack true originality.
Media Concerns and Industry Pushback
Media outlets have started pushing back against AI-generated content. Some have flagged submissions as AI-produced and rejected them outright. In extreme cases, firms face bans due to undisclosed or excessive AI use. This signals a growing concern about the integrity and authenticity of PR materials delivered to journalists and audiences.
The core issue is clear: thought leadership depends on original thinking. Without unique insights, claims to expertise lose credibility. Charging clients for AI-generated content without transparency risks damaging trust and client relationships. It also raises ethical questions about what value PR firms truly offer.
Balancing AI’s Benefits with Ethical Use
AI has practical benefits. It can speed up research, automate routine tasks, and inspire brainstorming. Many teams find it useful behind the scenes to become more efficient and informed. However, replacing human creativity and insight with AI-generated output crosses an ethical line.
AI aggregates existing information—it is not designed to produce original viewpoints. Relying on it as a shortcut to creativity undermines true expertise and the unique perspective a PR firm should provide. The risk is commoditizing services, reducing quality, and losing long-term credibility for short-term convenience.
The Road Ahead for PR Firms
The PR industry stands at a crossroads. Firms must decide whether to let AI dictate their creative output or uphold standards that emphasize originality and authenticity. With shrinking media resources and a growing demand for genuine engagement, the choice matters more than ever.
Smaller agencies with limited resources can still compete by focusing on craft, creativity, and client dedication. AI can assist, but it cannot replace the human insight that drives meaningful campaigns and builds lasting relationships.
- Establish clear AI usage policies that prioritize originality.
- Use AI to support, not replace, human creativity.
- Maintain transparency with clients about AI’s role in content creation.
- Focus on delivering unique, thoughtful strategies that stand out.
PR professionals should resist the temptation to commoditize their work through AI shortcuts. Instead, they should recommit to creating original, impactful communications that reflect their true expertise.
For those interested in learning how to responsibly integrate AI tools without sacrificing originality, resources like Complete AI Training’s courses for communication professionals offer practical guidance on ethical and effective AI use.
Your membership also unlocks:
