AI in Patient Information: What Clinicians Should Know Right Now
Patients are turning to artificial intelligence for quick answers about symptoms and conditions. Some trust it, many don't, and that's reasonable. The tech is new in clinical use, and it still misses the mark at times. Still, it's worth understanding where it helps, where it fails, and how to guide patients who use it.
Where Public Trust Stands
Surveys by NORC at the University of Chicago show trust in AI lags behind other sources. About 1 in 5 U.S. adults trust AI health information about the same as advice from family, friends, or employers. Fifteen percent trust AI as much as their provider, and 6% trust it more than their own provider.
These numbers will shift as people get more exposure to AI tools. For now, patients are experimenting. Your guidance can keep that experimentation safe and useful.
What AI Does Well for Patients
- Explains complex topics in plain language and at different reading levels.
- Summarizes long documents, clinical notes, or discharge instructions into key points.
- Allows follow-up questions that search engines don't handle as naturally.
The upside is real: faster comprehension, less confusion, and better patient questions during visits.
Where AI Falls Short
- It can be confidently wrong, especially without reliable sources.
- It may omit risks, eligibility criteria, or context that matters clinically.
- It reflects the quality of its prompts and the data it was trained on.
Bottom line: AI can assist with understanding, but it is not a clinical authority. Patients still need a human clinician to confirm next steps.
How to Coach Patients Who Use AI
- Ask what they used and what it said. Start from their summary to correct errors efficiently.
- Encourage source checking. Look for citations from guidelines, peer-reviewed journals, or major health systems.
- Suggest cross-checking with trusted resources like MedlinePlus' guidance on evaluating health information.
- Set boundaries: AI can inform questions, but treatment decisions come from the care team.
- For sensitive or high-risk issues (medication changes, emergency symptoms), tell patients to call or visit rather than rely on a tool.
Practical Uses for Care Teams
- Patient education drafts: Generate plain-language explanations, then edit for accuracy and your clinic's voice.
- Visit prep: Summarize long patient messages or external records before the appointment.
- After-visit summaries: Turn key points into take-home instructions, reviewed by a clinician.
- Staff training: Create quick primers on new guidelines, then verify against the original sources.
Simple Guardrails to Put in Place
- Always review AI-generated patient-facing content before sharing.
- Keep a short list of vetted sources (guidelines, institutional protocols) for verification.
- Document when AI-assisted materials are used and who approved them.
- Use HIPAA-compliant workflows; avoid entering identifiable patient data in tools that aren't approved.
What to Watch Next
Trust metrics will likely improve as tools get safer and more transparent. In the meantime, steer patients to use AI as a learning companion, not a decision-maker. With clear expectations and a quick verification step, AI can reduce confusion and save you time.
If you or your team want structured, role-based learning on these tools, explore focused options at Complete AI Training - Courses by Job.
Your membership also unlocks:
