Pennsylvania's AI Pilot Saves 95 Minutes a Day and Sets Ground Rules for Public Service
Pennsylvania's year-long AI pilot spans 14 agencies, with 175 staff saving about 95 minutes daily. $108K spend, guardrails, and required training steer a measured expansion.

Pennsylvania Tests AI in Government: What Agencies Can Learn Now
Pennsylvania is running a year-long generative AI pilot across 14 agencies, with 175 employees using tools like ChatGPT Enterprise for brainstorming, summarizing, drafting, and research. Early feedback shows an average of 95 minutes saved per employee per day. The state invested about $108,000 in licenses, training, and support.
Leaders plan to expand access, but only with required training and clear rules. The focus is simple: free up time for higher-value work while keeping accuracy, security, and accountability intact.
The Pilot at a Glance
- Scope: 175 employees across 14 agencies.
- Use cases: Idea generation, document summaries, drafting text, research.
- Reported benefit: 95 minutes saved per user per workday (average).
- Spend: ~$108,000 for licenses, training, and support.
Back-of-the-envelope capacity math if savings hold: 175 people × 95 minutes ≈ 277 hours saved per day. At 225 workdays, that's ≈ 62,000+ hours per year. Example valuation: 277 × 225 × $50/hour ≈ $3.1M in annual labor capacity. Your mileage will vary; measure it.
Guardrails and Governance
- No uploading private or restricted data.
- Employees must verify AI outputs before use.
- AI cannot make decisions for staff.
- Training on safe and responsible use is required before access.
- Generative AI Governing Board oversees policy and implementation.
- Labor and Management Collaboration Group collects feedback from employees and labor representatives.
Allegheny County issued related guidance that requires employees to disclose when AI assisted in generating content. Expect more local entities to add disclosure and documentation requirements.
Local Experiments to Watch
- Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh: launching a pilot to speed up housing recertifications, with a goal of cutting backlogs by up to 75%.
- Permitting: proposals to use AI for standard forms and workflows to reduce cycle times and bottlenecks.
What Your Agency Can Do Next
Start small, measure hard, and scale what works. Use the checklist below to move quickly without creating risk.
Phase 1: Set up a safe pilot (60-90 days)- Select 2-3 low-risk, high-volume tasks (summaries, intake triage, first-draft responses).
- Pick a secure enterprise tool with data controls and admin logs.
- Draft a short policy: approved uses, prohibited data, human review, disclosure rules.
- Mandate short training before access; include examples of good and bad prompts.
- Stand up oversight: business owner, data/security, legal, and union representation.
- Ban uploading PII, PHI, CJIS, and any confidential records.
- Require human-in-the-loop review and sign-off for any output used externally or in decisions.
- Enable audit logs; retain prompts/outputs per records schedules.
- Require disclosure when AI assists in public-facing content.
- Document model limitations and known failure modes for staff.
- Time saved per task and per user (weekly).
- Turnaround times and backlog reduction.
- Error and correction rates (before vs. after).
- Customer satisfaction (internal and public).
- Cost per task and escalations to SMEs.
- Confirm vendor does not train models on your prompts or data.
- Require data residency, encryption in transit/at rest, SSO, role-based access.
- Get a data processing agreement and incident response terms.
- Define retention, export, and deletion; align with public records laws.
- Plan testing: bias checks, red-teaming, and periodic model reviews.
Training: Make Responsible Use a Gate
Training should cover policy basics, prompt patterns, verification methods, citation standards, and disclosure. Provide role-specific examples and quick-reference guides.
If your team needs a starting point, see practical options by job function at Complete AI Training.
Policy Reference Points
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework for risk controls and governance patterns.
- Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights for transparency, data privacy, and human alternatives.
Bottom Line
Pennsylvania's pilot shows real time savings with modest spend, backed by practical guardrails and oversight. The formula is clear: start with bounded use cases, require training, enforce verification, measure outcomes, and expand based on data. Agencies that follow this path can reduce administrative drag while protecting the public trust.