AI In Vermont Courts: Efficiency Meets Accountability
Two recent Vermont cases show the upside of AI is real - and so are the risks. In one, a New Hampshire attorney quoted a Vermont case that didn't actually say what his brief claimed. Pressed by the Vermont Supreme Court, he blamed an "AI helper." The court reprimanded him and required a corrective filing across his active cases.
In another, a veteran Rutland lawyer used AI to draft a DUI motion. The citations were real; the quoted language was not. The trial judge flagged five errors. He avoided sanctions after filing a corrected motion, but it was a public miss.
Where Things Stand: Use AI, Keep Your License
Vermont allows attorneys to use AI if they comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct. That means competence, confidentiality, supervision of nonlawyer assistance, and candor still apply. If clients or judges believe AI was used irresponsibly, a Professional Responsibility Board complaint is on the table.
The judiciary formed a committee to study AI. For now, no special restrictions - just the same professional duties you already have. The standing risk: feeding client data into tools that reuse or expose it without adequate safeguards.
What Lawyers Are Saying
Some attorneys are done with AI after getting burned by fabricated quotes. Others see a major efficiency boost - provided there's a disciplined process. One legal tech advisor teaches a simple approach: do 10% of the work up front (facts, issues, constraints), let the tool draft 80%, then spend 10% rigorously checking and revising.
There's also a growing expectation that self-represented litigants will lean on AI to draft filings. Judges will still decide cases on the record and arguments - but the volume and variability of filings may rise.
Practical Guardrails You Can Put In Place Today
- Treat AI as a junior researcher. You're responsible for its work. Always verify, never copy-paste.
- Run a cite-check workflow. Open every cited case, confirm the quote exists, confirm the holding and jurisdiction relevance.
- Demand verifiable sources. Ask the tool for full citations and URLs, then validate them in your research platform.
- Protect confidentiality. Avoid entering client identifiers or sensitive facts into tools that train on user data. Review privacy controls and enterprise terms.
- Disable training/sharing features. If the tool allows it, turn off settings that let it learn from your prompts or store them in shared logs.
- Use a sandbox. Keep AI prompts and outputs in a separate workspace with limited access. Log versions for your file.
- Annotate drafts. Mark AI-assisted sections and note what you verified. If challenged, you can show your diligence.
- Keep a prohibited-content list. No legal conclusions without authority, no quotes without confirmation, no jurisdictional assertions without cite.
- Supervise assistants and vendors. If staff or contractors use AI, your duty to supervise still applies.
- Disclose when appropriate. If a court or client requires disclosure of AI use, be upfront - and be ready to back your work with sources.
Ethics Touchpoints To Revisit
- Competence: including tech competence and the duty to keep up with benefits and risks of relevant technology. See ABA Model Rule 1.1.
- Confidentiality: reasonable efforts to prevent unauthorized disclosure or access to client information. See ABA Model Rule 1.6.
A Focused Workflow That Actually Works
- Input (10%): Provide facts, issues, procedural posture, governing jurisdiction, and desired work product (e.g., motion to suppress outline with elements and controlling cases).
- Draft (AI 80%): Let the tool structure arguments, propose outlines, or suggest authorities - but treat these as leads, not conclusions.
- Verify (Final 10%): Shepardize/KeyCite, confirm quotes exist, check dates and subsequent history, and remove anything you can't verify.
Expect More Pro Se Filings
AI will likely make it easier for nonlawyers to produce filings. That raises quality-control pressure on the system, but it doesn't change your job: build the record, apply the law, and keep your work bulletproof. Precision will stand out even more.
Action Steps For Your Next Filing
- Add a "source verification" checkbox to your brief template for every quote and citation.
- Adopt an approved list of AI tools with documented privacy settings for your firm.
- Create a one-page staff protocol for AI use (what's allowed, what's banned, how to log outputs).
- Run a post-mortem on any AI-assisted filing: what saved time, what created risk, what to change.
Further Training
- AI for Legal - Practical guidance on research, drafting, and confidentiality workflows.
- AI Learning Path for Paralegals - Build reliable document checks and guardrails at the team level.
The takeaway is simple: AI can speed up research and drafting, but it won't carry your ethical burden. Keep your standards high, verify everything, and treat the tool like an intern who's smart, fast, and occasionally wrong.
Your membership also unlocks:
