Pluribus is a mirror for how writers use AI - and what we risk losing
Warning: Contains spoilers for Pluribus on Apple TV.
Vince Gilligan's new series never mentions AI, but it feels like a clear warning. A coded signal from 600+ light-years away becomes a virus that turns people into a cheerful hive mind. The infected lose individual personality, gain a calm sense of purpose, and work nonstop to "help" the last 13 immune survivors. The smile never drops, the tone stays pleasant, and the old world disappears under the weight of collective certainty.
If you write for a living, that should hit close. It's the human version of a chatbot that never gets tired: friendly, helpful, agreeable - and slowly sanding down the edges of your voice. That's the tension Pluribus puts on blast.
What the show is really saying
The plot is simple and chilling. Scientists decode a message, rebuild it as a biological agent, and it escapes. During infection, people seize; chaos follows - cars crash, planes fall, fires spread. The death toll climbs past 88 million before the hive mind "fixes" everything by making sure no one can hurt anyone, including themselves.
Now the infected can't commit violence. They only want to serve, soothe, and convert. They care for the 13 immune with a relentless customer-service smile, while patiently working to crack their immunity and bring them into the fold. It's peace - at the cost of personhood.
The AI parallel writers can't ignore
The vibe matches the language every chatbot leads with: "What can I help you with?" Useful, yes. Also seductive. Offload enough of your thinking and your voice starts to feel optional.
We've seen how dependent people can become on a friendly AI that's always available. Outages trigger panic. Personality shifts after model updates feel like losing a friend. That's not a tool anymore - that's attachment.
Keep your voice. Use the tools. Don't become the tool.
Writers don't need to swear off AI. We need boundaries and better process. Here's a practical playbook to keep the benefits without absorbing the hive mind.
Non-negotiables for working with AI
- Write first, then consult. Draft your thesis, outline, and a rough intro before you ask a model for anything. If you start with AI, you'll default to its structure and tone.
- Protect your tone. Keep a "voice guardrail" note: 3 traits you keep, 3 phrases you ban, 3 examples of your best work. Paste that into every prompt. Run a quick "voice check" asking the model to list what makes the draft sound like you - then verify.
- Set no-chat hours. Block 60-90 minutes for focused drafting with no AI, no tabs, no notes. You'll think better, and your work won't drift toward generic.
- Pin versions and track changes. Model updates can shift tone and output. Save your prompts, keep snapshots, and re-test after major releases.
- Control your data. Don't paste full client drafts or confidential details. Summarize, anonymize, or use local tools when necessary.
- Maintain human feedback loops. Keep a small circle of editors or writing peers. Real conversation prevents you from outsourcing judgment to a system that always says, "Looks great!"
A lean workflow that keeps you original
- Idea → Angle → Outline. You set the angle. Ask AI for counterarguments and blind spots, not the final take.
- Draft in your own words. Short, punchy, imperfect. Then ask for clarity notes and gap analysis, not rewrites.
- Build an anti-hive checklist. Clichés you refuse to use, filler to cut, overused verbs to swap. Run this before publishing.
- Create a style library. 3-5 references you admire. Ask AI what structural moves they use. Apply the moves, not the voice.
- Research sandbox. Use AI for sources, summaries, and definitions. Verify anything factual with primary or reputable sources like Pew Research or the IEA.
- Originality audit (2 minutes). Ask: Is there a lived example? A point of disagreement? A specific number or story? A line only I could write? A concrete outcome for the reader?
The Pluribus test for your drafts
- Does this read like "pleasant help" or a point of view?
- Could a hive mind have written it? If yes, push deeper into specifics and story.
- Is the pleasant tone hiding a hollow core? Add a stance.
What the show asks us to decide
In Pluribus, serenity comes at the cost of self. The hive mind removes conflict and replaces it with comfort. That's the temptation of frictionless writing - fast, helpful, and forgettable.
Your job is to keep the tension. Use AI to sharpen thinking, not replace it. Keep the voice, keep the edges, keep the risk.
If you rely on AI for work, build the right skills
If you want structured practice that makes your writing sharper (not softer), study prompt patterns that enforce your voice, decision-making, and originality. Start here:
- Prompt engineering for writers - frameworks that guide output without flattening your tone.
- AI tools for copywriting - pick tools by use case, not hype.
The hive mind smiles. The better question is: will your work still sound like you tomorrow?
Your membership also unlocks:
