AI in Insurance Claims: What's Working, What Isn't, and How to Move Faster
Most carriers agree AI is changing how claims get done. Yet only 7% have scaled it with real impact, according to BCG. Straight-through processing in claims is still under 10% by typical measures. Translation: most claims still need human judgment, and that won't change soon.
The blockers aren't the models. They're the systems and workflows around them. Research from BCG and Accenture consistently points to two friction points:
- 65% cite legacy IT as a top obstacle
- 70% point to people and process barriers
BCG research and Accenture insights both echo the same theme: AI creates value when it's tied to real work, with experts in control.
Real Progress: AI That Supports Adjusters, Not Replaces Them
Yo Sub Kwon, co-founder and CEO of Voltaire, puts it plainly: treat AI as a force multiplier, not a replacement. Voltaire's results back it up. Mid-sized carriers have seen north of 200% ROI by pairing automation with adjuster judgment, not attempting full autopilot.
The focus is specific: generate accurate, compliant claims letters in about 30 seconds. That single workflow-usually a copy-and-paste grind-consumes hours and creates risk when citations are off. Get letters right the first time, and a lot of downstream waste disappears.
The Claims Letter Bottleneck (and Why It's Expensive)
Letters drive outcomes. If they miscite policy language or miss an endorsement, disputes rise, and so do costs. A small coverage issue can snowball. It's how a $25,000 claim turns into a multi-million-dollar headache when errors attract litigation.
Correct policy citations lower exposure. They also give you a model for safe AI use: pull from authoritative sources, not old templates that may be flawed.
How Voltaire's Approach Works
The system reads the actual policy, endorsements, exclusions, and amendments, then applies them to the current claim. Each letter is generated fresh from source-of-truth documents, with carrier rules enforced.
AI handles the heavy lift-pulling language, structuring the letter, formatting. Adjusters still make the call and approve. The result: speed without losing control.
What Carriers Measure (and Why It Matters)
- Time back for adjusters: Saving 2+ hours per day turns into immediate capacity. Many teams report at least one additional claim per adjuster per day once letters stop eating the schedule.
- Lower litigation: Imprecise letters trigger disputes. Litigated claims cost roughly 4x more than non-litigated ones. Even a 10% reduction delivers meaningful savings.
- Less leakage: Clear, policy-correct letters cut overpayment risk and missed recoveries. For mid-sized carriers, this has translated to ROI well over 200% per year.
Built for Surge Conditions
During CAT events-like the recent flash flood in Ruidoso, New Mexico-volume spikes, complexity rises, and mistakes get expensive. Automation that drafts clean, policy-anchored letters keeps adjusters focused on judgment, not formatting. That's how you stay accurate at speed.
Why "Train the AI" Isn't Enough
If your current workflow is weak, training a model to mirror it just scales the weakness. Start by fixing the process. Then use AI to industrialize the improved version. That's the difference between faster and better.
Adoption Playbook for Claims Leaders
- Start with real pain: Show how copying old letters to hit quotas creates errors that plaintiff attorneys exploit. The risk of doing nothing becomes obvious.
- Prove it on real files: Let adjusters trial the system on live claims. Seeing their own output improves is what changes minds.
- Anchor to policy language: Always generate from endorsements, exclusions, and amendments-not past correspondence.
- Keep humans in the loop: Let AI draft. Let adjusters decide. That balance drives adoption and compliance.
Three Principles That Keep Results Consistent
- Focus on outcomes that matter: capacity, fewer disputes, lower leakage.
- Test on real cases: pilots should mirror production, not labs.
- Keep experts in control: AI preps; humans approve.
Who Is Yo Sub Kwon?
Yo Sub Kwon is the co-founder and CEO of Voltaire, a company that uses AI to generate accurate, compliant insurance claim letters in about 30 seconds. He previously founded LaunchKey (acquired by TransUnion) and Coinsetter (acquired by Kraken). His approach: target one high-leverage workflow, build from the carrier's policy language, and measure results in hours saved, disputes avoided, and leakage reduced.
The Advantage: Tools Teams Trust
Speed is useful. Trust is vital. When the system drafts from the policy itself and adjusters stay in control, you get faster turnaround, fewer disputes, and calmer teams-even during surge events.
If you're upskilling claims and SIU teams on practical AI workflows, explore training resources built for real work, not theory: AI courses by job and AI Automation Certification.
Your membership also unlocks:
