Powell’s AI Art Controversy: What Creatives Need to Know
Last week, Powell’s Books, the iconic independent bookstore in Portland, Oregon, found itself at the center of a heated debate about AI-generated art. The issue? A new merchandise line featuring designs that local artists and employees allege were created using artificial intelligence rather than human creativity.
Local Artists Speak Out
Portland artist Sam Pletcher publicly called out Powell’s on social media, pointing out that the store’s new merch relied heavily on AI art. Their message was clear: the city is full of talented artists struggling to make ends meet, yet Powell’s chose to use AI-generated designs instead of supporting the local creative community.
Adding to the pressure, Always Here, a queer and trans worker-owned bookstore, released a statement criticizing Powell’s decision. They described AI art as an insult to the human capacity for creativity and called it a sign of deeper issues within Powell’s management. More importantly, Always Here highlighted that Powell’s employees had raised concerns about AI art use months before the merch launch, but those concerns were ignored.
Employee Concerns and Union Backing
The International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) Local 5, representing Powell’s booksellers, has documented ongoing issues at the bookstore, including censorship and low wages. Many employees have expressed frustration over what they see as unethical business choices, but fear retaliation if they speak publicly.
After the controversy broke, Powell’s responded by affirming their support for human artists and commitment to creativity. However, they stopped short of a full apology. In response, the union urged Powell’s leadership to listen more closely to their employees—especially their in-house design team—and to take a clear stance on the use of generative AI in their business.
What Creatives Can Learn
This situation reveals how important it is for artists, workers, and communities to hold businesses accountable for their ethical choices. The union’s approach is a good example: they encourage solidarity and constructive dialogue rather than boycotts, asking customers to stay engaged and question questionable policies.
Similarly, Always Here urges supporters of authentic creativity to make their voices heard. They point out that Powell’s leaders likely only felt comfortable releasing AI-generated merch because they assumed customers wouldn’t notice or care. The response proves otherwise.
Why This Matters
- AI-generated art raises ethical questions about creative labor and compensation.
- Ignoring employee concerns can damage trust and community support.
- Open conversations about AI’s role in creative industries are essential.
- Collective action from workers and customers can influence company decisions.
If you’re a creative concerned about AI’s impact on your work, this is a moment to speak up. Whether it’s by supporting local artists, engaging with unions, or holding companies accountable, your voice matters.
For those interested in learning more about AI tools and their effects on creative fields, resources like Complete AI Training’s guide to AI generative art tools provide practical insights into navigating this evolving landscape.
Your membership also unlocks:
