Your AI strategy isn't failing. Your ops team is just ahead of it.
Big AI decks get applause. Real adoption comes from the people fixing problems under pressure.
Last quarter, one client launched a polished AI roadmap. Executive buy-in, budget approved, timelines locked. Three months later, only 4% of employees used the tools. Downstairs, IT operations were pasting stack traces into ChatGPT and Claude, shipping fixes faster, and auto-responding to tickets without asking for permission.
This gap is everywhere. The Stanford AI Index reports 78% of organizations use AI in at least one function. Gallup puts daily use at 10% of the workforce, with the Fed estimating just 0.5-3.5% of work hours involve AI support (source). This isn't a tech maturity issue. It's a behavior issue.
Why IT ops adopted without a mandate
Ops teams have forcing functions. When production is down at 3 AM, nobody cares about a strategic initiative. They care about getting the site back up.
If dropping logs into GPT-4 cuts root-cause analysis by 10 minutes, they'll use it. If Claude drafts a monitoring script in half the time, they'll use it. That urgency creates the kind of individual motivation no policy can manufacture.
AI also changes how people think about the work. Less searching, more prompting. Less writing from scratch, more reviewing and iterating. Adoption sticks when someone experiences a "compression moment" - a task that used to take an hour now takes 10 minutes. Ops teams hit these moments daily.
The pattern that scales: individual benefit beats mandates
The common mistake: trying to force adoption. "Everyone must use the assistant for documentation." "All engineers on Copilot by Q2." Top-down doesn't work if the bottom doesn't feel the win.
Look back at email in the 90s. No one mandated it. Engineers used it, told a teammate, and the value spread person-to-person. AI is a steeper climb because the benefits are more variable and require experimentation - but the diffusion pattern is the same.
- Incident response: "GPT-4 analyzes logs and suggests likely root causes - MTTR is down 30-40% on recurring issues."
- Triage and deflection: "Tier-1 tickets get answered by a bot. Engineers focus on complex fixes."
- Script generation: "Monitoring and runbook scripts now take minutes with AI pair programming."
These weren't "initiatives." They were tactical wins, discovered in the flow of work, shared peer-to-peer.
From ops to enterprise: where to focus next
Find the other forcing functions in your org. Customer support has SLAs and angry customers. Sales has quotas and end-of-quarter gaps. Finance has month-end close and audits. These teams are already motivated to shave minutes and reduce errors.
Your job isn't to craft the perfect strategy deck. It's to make experimentation easy, safe, and shareable. Lower the friction, then capture and spread what works.
- Provision approved AI tools with lightweight guardrails and clear data policies.
- Spin up a shared prompt library and simple playbooks for common tasks.
- Run weekly show-and-tells where people demo real tasks and time saved.
- Offer small, fast budgets for bottom-up pilots tied to concrete outcomes.
- Create a path from "shadow" wins to productionized workflows (ownership, QA, observability).
- Use a standard security and compliance checklist so teams aren't blocked for months.
The metrics that matter
Logins and feature clicks don't tell you if workflows changed. Track compression - time saved, quality improved, frustration removed.
- Voluntary adoption rate: How many people use AI tools without being told? Early indicator of real value.
- Peer sharing frequency: How often do teammates post prompts, snippets, or before/after examples?
- Concrete ROI examples: Can individuals name tasks now done in half the time with equal or better quality?
When ops says, "We've cut incident resolution by ~30 minutes on average," that's a compression moment. When they publish their prompt kits in Slack, that's transmission. When adjacent teams ask to learn the method, you have momentum worth scaling.
A simple 90-day blueprint
- Weeks 1-2: Pick two pilot teams with real forcing functions (e.g., ops and support). Baseline their cycle time, error rates, and rework. Stand up tools and guardrails.
- Weeks 3-6: Run weekly demos. Capture repeatable use cases. Start a shared prompt/playbook repo. Track voluntary use and time saved per task.
- Weeks 7-8: Productionize the top 3 workflows. Add monitoring, reviewers, and a rollback plan. Publish short internal guides.
- Weeks 9-12: Expand to sales and finance. Reuse the playbooks. Share before/after metrics org-wide to drive pull, not push.
What this means for leaders
AI adoption doesn't happen in slides. It happens when someone realizes a job they do every day just got dramatically easier. Your IT operations team is already there. Use them as the blueprint.
Remove friction. Fund experiments. Track compression, not clicks. And make the wins contagious through peer teaching and simple playbooks. Bottom-up momentum beats top-down mandates every time.
If your teams need a fast, practical on-ramp to build these workflows, consider this concise program: AI Certification for Coding. It pairs well with ops, support, and engineering pilots.
Your membership also unlocks:
