Companies are cutting middle managers to cut costs. They'll regret it.
One in five employers will use AI to eliminate more than half their middle management tier by the end of 2026. By 2029, 56% of CEOs plan to have removed most of these positions entirely, according to Gartner research.
Job postings for middle management roles have fallen 42% since April 2022, data from Revelio Labs shows. The tech sector is leading the charge.
The pressure is straightforward: companies made large AI investments and expected quick financial returns. When those returns didn't materialize fast enough, cost-cutting became the obvious move. But this strategy carries serious long-term risks that most organizations aren't considering.
The problem: managers are already burned out
Gallup's 2026 State of the Global Workforce report found that manager engagement has dropped to 22%-barely higher than the 19% engagement rate for non-managers. This is a nine-point decline since 2022, with a five-point drop between 2024 and 2025 alone.
The role has become undefined and stretched. Managers face competing demands with no clear boundaries, creating high stress and anxiety. Two in five existing managers are considering quitting to improve their wellbeing.
Gen Z is 1.7 times more likely than previous generations to avoid middle management roles, seeing their burned-out bosses as a cautionary tale.
Low manager engagement cost the global economy $10 trillion in lost productivity last year, Gallup found.
What AI can actually do
AI works best handling routine administrative tasks: timesheets, leave approvals, shift scheduling, calendar management. This frees managers to focus on what machines cannot do-developing people, building trust, and supporting learning.
But there's a critical distinction. AI can support managers in doing their jobs better. It should not replace the role itself.
Employees still want human connection. They need to be seen, heard, valued, and supported in their development. These are human capabilities that AI cannot replicate.
The complexity problem nobody is measuring
Organizations cutting manager headcount are focusing on "span of control"-how many people report to a manager. They're ignoring "span of complexity"-the difficulty and diversity of the work those people do.
Managers overseeing complex teams are 1.6 to 2.3 times more likely to handle routine support tasks themselves. They also have 20% lower intent to stay in their roles.
Managers with higher percentages of people-focused work are 1.3 times more likely to stay.
Cutting headcount when managers already have high spans of control and high team complexity is a mistake. By 2028, 75% of organizations that cut middle management due to AI will rehire at least half those positions-an expensive correction.
The succession planning crisis
Middle managers have historically been where leaders learned to lead. They coached and developed the next generation of talent. Cut this layer, and you eliminate the system that develops leaders.
Within three years, organizations will need senior leaders badly. But the pipeline they destroyed won't refill itself in time. They'll end up hiring back at premium prices due to market competition.
Layoffs also materially reduce trust in leadership. Other employees' intent to stay declines as well.
Fifty-five percent of employers that laid off workers due to AI already regret the decision, according to Forrester Research.
What organizations should do instead
Start by defining what you actually need managers to do. What competencies must they have? What does success look like?
Once you know this, you can build a proper talent pipeline, develop managers effectively, and understand where AI can genuinely help.
The real fix requires systems change. It means examining organizational policies and practices. It means selecting managers carefully, training them properly, and supporting them with clear roles and reasonable workloads.
This is harder than replacing people with software. But it's the only approach that works long-term.
Use AI for Management to automate the administrative work that buries your managers. Use it to help them coach and develop their teams more effectively. But don't use it as an excuse to eliminate a role that remains critical to how organizations function.
The choice between cutting managers and fixing the system is not a choice at all. One saves money today and costs far more tomorrow. The other takes effort now and builds something sustainable.
Your membership also unlocks:
