Rethinking Higher Ed for the AI Era: WGU's Two-Part Plan for Value, Access, and Affordability

Learning has shifted from campus-first to internet-native; students expect access and proof of value. AI is table stakes; colleges grade judgment, map skills to jobs, and cut cost.

Categorized in: AI News Education
Published on: Nov 14, 2025
Rethinking Higher Ed for the AI Era: WGU's Two-Part Plan for Value, Access, and Affordability

The Campus-Native Experience Is Now Internet-Native

The old idea of learning as a single, on-campus experience is fading. The internet turned knowledge into a public utility, and students now expect access, speed, and proof that what they learn matters.

Colleges are adapting. Curricula are being rebuilt, faculty roles are shifting, and AI is forcing a rethink of how teaching and assessment should work.

What Changed (And Why It Matters)

  • Access is democratized: The gate around higher ed is lower. Students learn anywhere, at any time, and they compare your program to everything else online.
  • Faculty roles are evolving: Less time lecturing, more time coaching, curating, and assessing higher-order thinking.
  • Digital is the default: Learning models that were once campus-native are becoming internet-based and increasingly intelligent.

AI Moves From Topic to Tool

AI isn't just a subject to cover; it's a capability students must use. That means assignments, rubrics, and policies need to reflect AI-assisted work as a baseline, not an exception.

The goal: evaluate judgment, process, and originality, not who can type the fastest. You don't fight the calculator; you teach better math.

Value, Relevance, and Affordability Lead

Students ask three questions: Is this worth it? Will it help me get or grow in a job? Can I afford it? If the answer stalls on any of those, they leave.

Programs that win map skills to roles, reduce time to completion, and cut costs without cutting outcomes.

A Practical Example: WGU's Two-Part Strategy

In 2024, WGU outlined a clear play: accelerate what already works to increase student value, and reimagine the models that constrain today's talent economy. They've already embedded AI use into competencies across 62% of programs.

Take the cue: make AI use explicit in outcomes, practice, and assessment. Treat it as table stakes.

Action Plan for Education Leaders

  • Refresh program outcomes: Add AI-use competencies (prompting, critique, verification, workflow design) where industry uses them. Map each outcome to real job tasks.
  • Redesign assessment: Allow AI-assisted work; require process evidence (prompts, drafts, rationale). Grade thinking and judgment. Set clear disclosure rules.
  • Upskill faculty fast: Short, recurring workshops on AI-assisted lesson prep, assessment, feedback, and academic integrity. Share playbooks and exemplars.
  • Modernize delivery: Blended by default. Asynchronous core content, synchronous coaching for practice and critique. Record, chunk, and tag assets for reuse.
  • Cut cost drivers: Use open resources where quality allows and reserve paid content for clear value adds. Track material usage and outcomes.
  • Stackable credentials: Offer micro-certs and pathways that stack into degrees. Recognize prior learning and verified experience.
  • Data, not guesswork: Instrument the LMS to monitor engagement and mastery. Use early alerts and nudge systems while honoring privacy.
  • Industry alignment: Validate curricula with employers twice a year. Co-create projects and externships so students build proof of work.
  • Equity and access: Provide device loans, AI access guidelines, and quiet study options. Don't let tooling gaps become achievement gaps.

Redefine the Faculty Role

Move from "content deliverer" to "learning architect." Curate the best resources, design authentic tasks, and coach students through judgment calls AI can't make.

Students need models of thinking, not just answers. Your expertise sets the bar for quality and ethics.

Measure What Matters

  • Program-level: completion time, cost to credential, job-role alignment, and employment outcomes.
  • Course-level: mastery rates, assessment validity under AI use, feedback cycle time, and student satisfaction tied to specific teaching practices.
  • Equity: outcomes disaggregated by modality and support access.

Resources to Move Faster

Bottom Line

The campus isn't going away. It's expanding.

Treat AI as infrastructure, align programs to real work, and measure value like your students do. Build for outcomes, then let modality follow.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)