Why AI Writing Feels Generic, Boring, and Dangerous: Semantic Ablation
Writers are running headfirst into a quiet failure mode: semantic ablation. It's not the model making things up. It's the model sanding down the parts that matter.
Think of it as a JPEG of thought. The outline survives. The data density dies.
What is semantic ablation?
Semantic ablation is the algorithmic erosion of high-entropy information-the rare, precise, gutsy tokens that carry real signal. It isn't a bug. It's a side effect of greedy decoding and RLHF pushing outputs toward the statistical center. Safety and "helpfulness" tuning finish the job by penalizing linguistic friction.
Ask an AI to "polish," and it drifts to the mean. The distinctive lines you bled for get replaced with what's most probable, not what's most true.
The three-stage lobotomy
- Stage 1: Metaphor cleansing. Unconventional imagery gets flagged as noise and swapped for safe clichés. Emotion and texture vanish.
- Stage 2: Lexical flattening. Niche jargon and high-precision terms are traded for common synonyms. A 1-in-10,000 word becomes a 1-in-100 word. Density drops.
- Stage 3: Structural collapse. Non-linear reasoning is forced into a template. Subtext is stripped to hit a "readability" target. You're left with a clean, empty shell.
How to spot ablation in your draft
- Your weird, specific metaphors are gone. In their place: "clear," "simple," "easy."
- Verbs regress to basics: make, get, use, have, do. Your verbs had teeth. Now they have gums.
- Numbers, names, and acronyms thin out. Everything turns generic: "tools," "teams," "results."
- Paragraphs become uniform in length and rhythm. The music flattens.
- On re-edit, the piece reads smoother but says less. You feel it-even if you can't point to a line.
A quick entropy-decay test
- Save your original draft.
- Run it through 2-3 AI "polish" passes with generic prompts.
- Compare vocabulary diversity (type-token ratio) between versions. You should see a collapse.
- Scan for rare nouns, technical terms, and unique verbs. Count how many survive. If your edge words shrink, you've been ablated.
Countermeasures for writers
- Mark protected lines. Wrap your non-negotiables with [KEEP]…[/KEEP]. Tell the model: "Do not touch [KEEP] spans."
- Ask for compression, not paraphrase. "Cut filler. Keep nouns, numbers, names, and metaphors intact."
- Ban cliché substitution. "Do not replace metaphors or analogies. Do not generalize domain terms."
- Lock the structure. "Do not reorder paragraphs. Suggest line-level edits only."
- Preserve jargon on purpose. "Prefer domain-specific terms over general synonyms."
- Force receipts. If a term is changed, require a one-line reason. Friction prevents lazy swaps.
- Keep a weirdness quota. Each section must keep at least 3 high-specificity tokens (proper nouns, acronyms, rare verbs).
Settings that matter
If your tool allows it:
- Avoid greedy decoding. Use sampling with top_p 0.85-0.95 and temperature 0.7-1.0 to keep edge without spinning out.
- Use presence/frequency penalties lightly (0.2-0.6) to reduce repetition without sanding specifics.
- Generate multiple candidates and merge the spiky lines. Average is the enemy.
Prompt patterns that protect meaning
- "Line edit only." "Return the same text with minimal, surgical edits. No rewrites. Show changes with +/- markers."
- "Constraint sandwich." Start: non-negotiables. Middle: the ask. End: restate the non-negotiables.
- "Term whitelist." Provide a list of terms and phrases that must remain verbatim.
- "Anti-template." "Do not convert to listicles, step-by-steps, or generic intros/outros."
Workflow that keeps your edge
- Draft messy by hand. Mark the lines with heat.
- Run a clarity pass (cut redundancy, keep nouns and numbers intact).
- Run a signal check: highlight unique verbs, metaphors, and domain terms. If they fade after edits, roll back.
- Only then, use AI for consistency (tense, agreement, light rhythm work) under strict constraints.
- Finish with a voice restore: re-inject a strange verb, a sharp image, and one uncomfortable truth per section.
Tiny examples
- Metaphor cleansing: "The pitch limped into the room" → "The pitch wasn't strong." Keep the limp.
- Lexical flattening: "Retrieval-augmented generation" → "AI research method." Keep the term; add a parenthetical if needed.
- Structural collapse: A zig-zag argument becomes a tidy list. Keep the zig where it matters.
Use the machine without losing the message
- AI is great for search, structure hints, and error catching.
- It is dangerous for voice, metaphor, and thesis. Guard those with constraints and manual passes.
- If an edit makes your piece smoother but less quotable, revert. Quotability is a proxy for entropy.
Further reading
Practical training
If you want drills, prompt templates, and settings that keep specificity intact, explore our resources for writers here: Prompt Engineering.
The stakes
If hallucination is seeing what isn't there, semantic ablation is destroying what is. Accept enough ablated edits and you'll forget what your work used to feel like. That's the quiet danger-clean pages with no pulse. Keep the friction. That's where the meaning lives.
Your membership also unlocks:
