Stop Building Tech for Tech's Sake: Reduce Clinician Friction to Improve Care
One clear message echoed across EMEA Patient Engagement: too many digital health startups fixate on AI features and novel tech while missing the only metric that matters-less friction for clinicians and better outcomes for patients. As Reenita Das has underscored, if a solution doesn't remove work, reduce clicks, or improve safety, it won't last beyond a pilot.
This is a call to refocus. Build for real clinical workflows. Measure the grind you remove. Prove it fast.
The root problem: misaligned product goals
Most pitches promise smarter insights. Few remove a task. The result is more screens, more alerts, and more context switching. Clinicians are tired of systems that add steps in the name of intelligence.
Shift your definition of value: fewer minutes per task, fewer handoffs, fewer errors, and fewer surprises at the bedside.
Start with these clinician pain points
- Documentation load and note bloat
- Prior authorization and payer ping-pong
- Message overload in inboxes and portals
- Alert fatigue and irrelevant decision support
- Care coordination across fragmented systems
- Device, app, and login sprawl
- Low signal-to-noise in data feeds
- Manual quality reporting and audits
If your product doesn't meaningfully reduce at least one of these, pause and recalibrate.
Design rules for real clinical impact
- Build inside the workflow: Extend the EHR when you can. No extra portals. No duplicate data entry.
- Reduce steps, don't add layers: Fewer clicks, fewer keystrokes, fewer screens. Track it.
- Right alert, right moment: Context-aware, quiet by default, with clear actions and easy snooze.
- Make handoffs cleaner: Structured summaries, clear ownership, and status that updates itself.
- Automate the boring: Pre-fill, pre-verify, pre-authorize where policy allows. Humans review exceptions.
- Privacy and safety as first-class features: Log everything, keep least-privilege access, and simplify audits.
Validation before code: a fast path
- 1-hour shadowing: Watch the full task loop-no scripts, just reality. Note every stall and workaround.
- Paper prototype: Test screen flows on paper. Count steps. If you can't reduce them here, software won't save it.
- Zero-integration pilot: Run a manual or "lite" trial for two weeks. Prove time savings on a small cohort.
- Define kill metrics: If friction doesn't drop by X% in Y days, stop and fix.
Metrics that matter to clinical, safety, and operations
- Time per task: Minutes to complete documentation, prior auth, discharge, or referral
- Interaction load: Clicks, keystrokes, and screen switches per workflow
- Throughput: Patients per session, consult-to-treatment time, and bed turnover
- Quality and safety: Medication errors, missed follow-ups, duplicate tests, preventable escalations
- Patient engagement: Response rates, no-shows, portal actions completed, time to resolution
- Staff well-being: After-hours EHR time, message backlog, and burnout indicators
These are your scoreboard. Build dashboards that show movement weekly, not quarterly.
Patient engagement that actually helps care
- Reduce friction for patients too: Fewer logins, plain language, and channels they already use.
- Close the loop inside the clinical system: Patient inputs should auto-populate the clinician's workflow.
- Measure next-step completion: Scheduling finished, meds picked up, care plan acknowledged.
Women in Health IT: inclusive design raises quality
- Include female clinicians and leaders in discovery and testing from day one.
- Stress-test for equity: language, accessibility, caregiver roles, and schedule constraints.
- Track outcomes by demographics to spot hidden friction and safety gaps.
Workflow integration essentials
- Interfaces: Use standard FHIR resources, keep payloads lean, and cache sensibly.
- Identity: SSO or nothing. Extra passwords kill adoption.
- Data discipline: No duplicate sources of truth. Write back once, in the right place.
- Change management: 30-minute training max. If you need more, the design is off.
Procurement checklist for buyers
- Show me baseline and a two-week pilot plan
- List the tasks you remove, not features you add
- Prove click and time reduction in a real clinic
- Detail integration points and who maintains them
- Share security posture and audit workflow in plain terms
- Define success and exit criteria upfront
For startups: questions before your next sprint
- Which task are we removing, and by how much?
- Where in the EHR does this live?
- What will the clinician do less of tomorrow because of us?
- What is our kill metric if we don't cut friction?
- Which safety and quality measures will improve first?
Safety and burden resources
If you need a framework for reducing documentation and alert burden, review federal guidance on usability and burden reduction from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT. It gives practical levers for EHR integration and clinician workload relief. See ONC's burden reduction strategy.
For a quick refresher on patient safety principles that tie to workflow design, this summary is useful. WHO: Patient Safety.
Build literacy to ask better AI questions
AI can help-but only after you map workflows and choose clear success metrics. If your team needs focused upskilling to evaluate AI tools against clinical work, these role-based paths can help. Courses by job.
Here's the bottom line: clinicians don't need more tech. They need less friction. Start there, measure honestly, and you'll create solutions that last beyond the pilot and actually improve care.
Your membership also unlocks:
