A new study published in Journalism Practice warns that AI may be "deskilling" journalists, eroding core investigative abilities that writers rely on to produce original, accurate work. The findings challenge the trade-off between efficiency and the hands-on process that builds professional judgment.
The growing use of AI for Writers has sparked debate about whether the technology assists or diminishes the craft. Researchers interviewed working reporters who raised concerns that AI-generated background summaries, interview questions, and early drafts could weaken skills like tracking down information, consulting primary sources, and building knowledge through direct contact with experts.
Process over product
Good journalism results from a less visible process. Reporters begin with an incomplete understanding and test a hypothesis through observation, interviewing, and research. They compare accounts, search for gaps in public records, and follow leads that often change the entire premise of a story. That difficult, nonlinear work shapes a reporter's ability to judge what matters.
When AI synthesizes research before a reporter ever touches primary material, the core of that process is short-circuited. New journalists who start with a machine-generated summary may never develop the same instincts for inquiry. They miss the discomfort of asking strangers questions and the surprise of genuine connection that shifts the work from product fixation to real discovery.
What AI misses
An AI-generated brief cannot reliably tell a reporter what has been overlooked, which assumptions need challenging, or why a source hesitated before answering. Those skills come from attention, curiosity, and repeated contact with evidence and people. A well-written prompt does not replace years of field experience.
The risk extends beyond individual skill loss. AI systems largely draw from what has already been recorded and published. Journalism is often most necessary precisely where that record is incomplete. When reporters begin their work from an AI synthesis of what is already known, they risk letting the existing record determine the story. The people and experiences missing from the record remain invisible.
Why this matters for writers
Writers in any field depend on the same foundational skills of inquiry and verification. Outsourcing the early stages of research to an AI tool may save time, but it can also atrophy the ability to spot what is not yet documented. The most valuable work often comes from chasing a hunch, knocking on a door, or noticing a detail that no algorithm flagged. Learn to use these tools, but protect the habits of attention and primary sourcing that keep your craft sharp.
Your membership also unlocks:
