Thomson Reuters (TSX:TRI) AI push after the pullback: undervalued entry or already priced in?

Thomson Reuters (TSX:TRI): What Legal Teams Should Know About Its New AI Push and Current Valuation

Thomson Reuters has launched two notable AI tools for professionals: ONESOURCE Sales and Use Tax AI for U.S. compliance, and CoCounsel Legal with agentic capabilities in the UK. For in-house counsel and law firms, that means more automation in tax determination, document work, and research workflows built on TR's content and product suite.

Markets have been volatile. Over the last 90 days, the share price return sits at 31.28%, with a 1-year total shareholder return of 37.50% and a 5-year total shareholder return of 50.89%. Momentum may be cooling, but the long-term trend is intact.

Valuation Snapshot (at a glance)

• Most-followed view: Fair value of CA$265.98 versus a last close of CA$150.45. That implies the stock is 43.4% undervalued if those assumptions hold.
• Why that matters: The case rests on TR's proprietary content, integrated workflow tools, and "category leader" position driving sticky, recurring revenue and higher margins as AI features deepen usage.
• Counterpoint: TRI trades at a P/E of 28.2x - above the North American Professional Services industry at 23.3x and peers at 26.5x, and only slightly below a "fair" ratio estimate of 30.1x. If sentiment cools, the multiple offers limited protection.

What This Means for Legal Teams

• Workflow impact: Expect faster tax classification, reduced manual review in routine drafting, and quicker research summaries. Time saved should appear first in tax, regulatory, and high-volume knowledge tasks.
• Vendor consolidation: If TR's AI is tightly integrated across Westlaw, Practical Law, ONESOURCE, and drafting tools, consolidation could lower context-switching and training overhead.
• Budgeting: AI features often arrive as add-ons or higher tiers. Track seat counts, usage caps, and attach rates to avoid quiet expansion in spend.
• Risk posture: Legal teams will be held to higher standards on data handling, provenance, and auditability. Ask for evidence, not brochures.

Procurement and Risk Checklist (keep this handy)

• Evidence of ROI: Hours saved per matter, accuracy benchmarks by use case, and before/after metrics in pilot groups.
• Data governance: Where data is processed and stored, cross-border data flow controls, retention policies, and opt-outs for model training.
• Confidentiality and privilege: Clear contract terms on data isolation, encryption, and access logs. Confirm model inputs/outputs do not leak to shared training sets.
• Accountability: Human-in-the-loop controls, audit trails, redlining history, and explainability summaries for critical outputs.
• Quality controls: Hallucination rates, citation accuracy, benchmark datasets, and documented failure modes.
• Resilience: SLAs, uptime targets, rate limits, fallback modes, export options, and termination assistance.
• Regulatory alignment: Map features to your jurisdiction's AI, privacy, and professional conduct requirements. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework is a useful reference point. NIST AI RMF

Signals to Track in 2026

• Adoption rates: Attach rates for AI modules across TR's suite (especially in tax and legal drafting).
• Pricing power: Packaging shifts, per-seat add-ons, and enterprise bundle discounts.
• Retention and expansion: Net revenue retention and churn within legal/tax sub-segments.
• Content advantage: New proprietary datasets or partnerships that strengthen TR's moat versus other legal tech providers.
• Regulatory comfort: Customer references where AI passed internal risk reviews at large law firms or regulated enterprises.

How to Pilot These Tools Without Disrupting Your Practice

• Start narrow: Pick 1-2 repeatable tasks (e.g., sales tax determination for a defined product set or first-draft NDAs) and run a 60-90 day pilot.
• Fix your baseline: Time your current process before the pilot. Track throughput, error rates, and rework.
• Set gates: Define pass/fail thresholds (accuracy, review time saved, user acceptance). Roll out only if the pilot clears them.
• Align incentives: Pair AI usage with clear billing and staffing models. For firms, translate time saved into fixed-fee competitiveness instead of margin leakage.
• Codify policy: Update guidance on confidentiality, client consent (where applicable), and cite-checking before any AI-assisted output goes to clients or regulators.

Investment Context (for your CFO and board updates)

• Bull case: If TR's AI deepens integration across research, drafting, and tax workflows, higher stickiness and cross-sell can support the "undervalued" view (fair value at CA$265.98 vs. CA$150.45).
• Bear case: Slower adoption, credible competitor launches, or pricing pushback could compress growth and keep the P/E ceiling near ~30x.
• Neutral read: The current multiple (28.2x) leaves less room for sentiment shocks. Execution, not headlines, likely drives returns from here.

Bottom Line

TR's AI rollout is meaningful for legal and tax teams, and the valuation debate hinges on how quickly those features convert into retention, cross-sell, and margin gains. Treat this period as a chance to pilot, measure, and formalize policy. Keep optionality with contracts and avoid long commitments until the metrics are clear.

This content is for information only and is not financial advice.

If you're building internal skills around AI in legal work, explore practical training options by role here: AI courses by job