Consumer Companies Using AI Must Balance Legal and Reputational Issues
More than three quarters of in-house counsel report using AI to create marketing and advertising content. That speed comes with exposure. Regulators are watching, plaintiff theories are maturing, and consumers are quick to call out synthetic content that crosses a line.
The job now is simple: keep the upside of AI, while removing the obvious sources of legal and brand risk. That takes guardrails, clean contracts, and a calm review process that holds up under pressure.
Why this matters for legal teams
AI is now embedded in creative workflows-copy, images, video, even influencer scripts. Every output can trigger claims, privacy, and IP issues. Legal needs visibility into where AI is used, what data feeds it, and how content is approved before it goes live.
If you don't formalize this, you inherit shadow tools, unclear ownership, and disclosures that show up late (or never).
Top risk areas to control
- False advertising and substantiation: AI can invent benefits. Require evidence before publication and maintain a substantiation file. See the FTC's guidance on AI marketing claims here.
- Endorsements, reviews, and influencers: If AI drafts testimonials or scripts, ensure clear, proximate disclosures and no fake reviews. Review the FTC's Endorsement Guides here.
- Intellectual property: Clear rights for all third-party inputs (images, music, likeness). Watch for outputs that mimic protected characters, logos, or artist styles in a way that implies origin or sponsorship.
- Copyright ownership of AI output: Purely machine-generated material may be unprotectable. Ensure meaningful human authorship and document it.
- Privacy and data use: Don't paste personal or confidential data into public models. Map data flows, apply DPA terms, and respect regional restrictions (children's data, biometrics, scraping limits).
- Bias and discrimination: Screen ad targeting, imagery, and copy for disparate impact, especially in credit, housing, employment, and health contexts.
- Security and confidentiality: Lock down prompts, outputs, and training data. Treat prompts as sensitive-many leaks start there.
- Transparency and labeling: If synthetic media could mislead, label it. Disclose material AI use where it affects consumer decisions.
- Accessibility: Ensure AI-generated content includes alt text, captions, and readable contrast.
Governance that actually works
- Approved tool list: Name the models, versions, and uses that are allowed. Block everything else.
- Data rules: No PII, PHI, or confidential materials in public tools. Use red-team prompts and blocklists for sensitive terms.
- Human-in-the-loop: Legal and compliance review for high-risk claims, testimonials, and comparative ads.
- Substantiation and clearance: Keep evidence, licenses, likeness releases, and fair use analyses in one place.
- Traceability: Log prompts, model versions, and approvals. Time-stamp final outputs and store for audit.
- Labeling: Add synthetic media badges or captions where confusion is likely.
- Takedown and incident plan: Route issues fast, with pre-approved statements and contact trees.
- Training: Brief marketers on what they can and can't do with AI. If helpful, point teams to practical upskilling options by job role.
Contract clauses for AI vendors and creative agencies
- IP ownership and license: Your company owns deliverables; no vendor reuse without consent.
- No training on your data: Prohibit using your inputs or outputs to train public or third-party models.
- Indemnities: Cover IP infringement, privacy violations, and deceptive marketing claims arising from the tool or vendor materials.
- Security and deletion: SOC 2 or equivalent, breach notice timelines, secure deletion on request or termination.
- Output controls: Vendor implements filters for unsafe or infringing content and documents model updates that affect risk.
- Audit and transparency: Rights to review safeguards, data locations, subprocessors, and model change logs.
- Jurisdiction and data residency: Keep consumer data in approved regions; bind subprocessors to the same terms.
A simple workflow for AI-created ads
- Marketing brief with claims, evidence, and audience limits.
- Create with approved tools using safe prompts; save versions.
- Run policy checks: claims, IP, privacy, bias, accessibility, disclosures.
- Legal sign-off for high-risk items; archive substantiation and approvals.
- Publish with labels where needed; monitor performance and complaints.
Reputation playbook
Assume a prompt or draft will leak. Write a short statement now that explains your review process and standards, so you are not improvising under fire.
Don't use synthetic voices or faces of real people without clear, written consent. If a campaign uses AI heavily, label it-consumers reward clarity more than perfection.
What to do this quarter
- Audit how and where AI is used in marketing and advertising.
- Publish a one-page policy and an approved tool list.
- Patch your MSAs and SOWs with the clauses above.
- Stand up a fast-track legal review for claims, endorsements, and synthetic media.
- Build a substantiation folder structure and start logging prompts and outputs.
- Run a tabletop exercise for an AI content takedown and public response.
The takeaway: AI can speed creative work, but it doesn't change your obligations. Tighten controls, make your review process visible, and protect the brand while you scale what works.
Your membership also unlocks:
