Trump's "One Rulebook" for AI: What Executives Need to Know Now
US President Donald Trump said he will sign an executive order to create a single national "rulebook" for AI development, announced via Truth Social on Monday. He indicated the order would override state approvals, though the legality of that move is uncertain. Trump wrote, "There must be only One Rulebook if we are going to continue to lead in AI," and warned, "THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THIS! AI WILL BE DESTROYED IN ITS INFANCY!"
The White House is also pushing for a federal AI framework within this year's defence budget. That effort has split Republicans, with some insisting states retain authority over AI rules. State lawmakers from both parties have cautioned that federal preemption could erase protections already passed at the state level.
Why this matters for your strategy
A single federal framework could simplify compliance and speed deployment-if it is clear, workable, and actually preempts. If it stalls or is struck down, you're back to a state-by-state patchwork with uneven obligations on safety, transparency, and data use. Either way, you need a plan that works under both outcomes.
The legal and political friction
An executive order alone may not be enough to preempt state law without explicit authority from Congress. Expect immediate litigation if the order attempts broad override. Meanwhile, Congress may attach AI provisions to the defence budget, but final text and scope are still fluid.
Bottom line: timelines and rules can shift fast. Build flexibility into roadmaps and budgets so you don't overcommit to one regulatory path.
Operational implications to model
- Compliance architecture: Centralize AI risk controls so you can toggle between federal-only and mixed federal-state regimes without rework.
- Product gating: Define release criteria tied to safety testing, provenance, and opt-outs for sensitive use cases. Keep them adjustable by jurisdiction.
- Vendor portfolio: Require standardized attestations (security, data rights, model provenance), plus state addenda that can be enabled if needed.
- Data governance: Map data flows, retention, and training data rights. Assume audits-document decisions and model changes.
- Incident response: Set thresholds for model rollback, disclosure, and user notifications. Simulate an AI incident and measure time-to-contain.
What to do this week
- Scenario plan: Build two regulatory scenarios-federal preemption vs. state patchwork-and stress test cost, time-to-market, and exposure under both.
- Policy watchlist: Track the executive order text, defence budget AI provisions, and state bills most relevant to your sector.
- Controls baseline: Align with public standards like the NIST AI Risk Management Framework so you're credible under either regime.
- Board brief: Update risk appetite for AI deployments that depend on preemption. Stage investments to avoid stranded spend.
- Talent and training: Upskill product, legal, and security teams on AI governance. If you need structured options, see AI courses by job role.
Signals to watch
- Executive Order text: Scope, definitions, enforcement, and any claimed basis to override state rules. Track issuance via the White House executive orders page.
- Defence budget language: Any explicit preemption, federal approvals, or safety/testing mandates that affect procurement and commercial releases.
- Lawsuits and state pushback: Early court filings or state AG statements will signal how fast the order could be limited.
- Industry commitments: Voluntary standards may become de facto requirements for insurers, partners, and enterprise buyers.
The executive takeaway
Prepare for two regulatory paths and don't bet the roadmap on either one. Lock in common-sense controls-testing, provenance, documentation, and vendor assurances-that will stand regardless of politics. Keep capital flexible, ship in gated phases, and stay close to the policy process so you can move first when the rules are clear.
Your membership also unlocks:
