Tsinghua Rolls Out China's First Campus-Wide AI Guidelines for Teaching and Research

Tsinghua unveils China's first AI guidelines for classrooms and labs-AI assists, humans lead. Clear rules, disclosure, bans on plagiarism, and steps educators can apply now.

Categorized in: AI News Education
Published on: Dec 05, 2025
Tsinghua Rolls Out China's First Campus-Wide AI Guidelines for Teaching and Research

Tsinghua University rolls out China's first AI guidelines for education and research

Tsinghua University has released a campus-wide framework on how artificial intelligence should be used in classrooms and labs. It treats AI as a support tool-useful, but never a replacement for human thinking. For educators, this is a practical reference you can apply today, not a vague vision piece.

Below is a quick guide to what's inside, why it matters, and what to do next.

Table of contents

What's in Tsinghua's AI framework?

The document is organized into three parts: General Provisions; Teaching and Learning; and Theses, Dissertations, and Practical Achievements. It sets clear, scenario-based rules for both faculty and students.

General Provisions position AI as an assistive tool. Humans lead; AI supports. Five principles steer usage:

  • Responsibility
  • Compliance and integrity
  • Data security
  • Critical thinking
  • Fairness

Explicit bans include plagiarism, ghostwriting, and processing sensitive data without authorization.

Teaching and Learning requires instructors to define course-level rules and remain accountable for any AI-generated content used in instruction. Students may use AI to support learning, but copying or lightly paraphrasing outputs is strictly prohibited.

Theses and Dissertations draw a hard line. AI cannot replace the intellectual rigor expected in graduate research. Supervisors must guide appropriate use and ensure originality in all submitted work.

Strategic context: why it matters now

Tsinghua has piloted AI-enabled teaching for years. The shift here is formal boundaries-moving from experiments to institutional accountability.

The framework is a "living system," meant to evolve with new tools and roles (from admin systems to agent instructors). That stance signals regular iteration rather than a one-time policy drop.

For comparison, global bodies are also pushing clarity around safe, transparent AI in education. See UNESCO guidance on AI in education for broader policy context.

What marketers and edtech players should know

  • A model for digital governance in education: This framework can serve as a benchmark for universities and ministries. It balances innovation with clear risk controls.
  • Demand for explainable AI: Transparency, bias mitigation, and human oversight are non-negotiable. Claims must be auditable, not just impressive.
  • Ethical marketing standards: Pitch outcomes aligned with academic values-originality, fairness, and critical thinking-not vague promises of "efficiency."
  • AI literacy as a growth area: The university will promote training and workshops. Providers of AI literacy programs, policy playbooks, or ethics modules will find rising demand.

Practical steps for educators and administrators

Use Tsinghua's approach as a scaffold. Start small, then standardize.

  • Publish course-level AI policies: Define what's permitted, what's not, and where disclosure is required. Revisit each term.
  • Require disclosure of AI assistance: Add a short "AI use" section to assignments and projects. Make it part of grading criteria.
  • Protect sensitive data: Prohibit uploading identifiable student or research data to public tools without approval. Provide vetted alternatives.
  • Update thesis supervision: Agree on allowed tools, acceptable use cases (e.g., outline brainstorming), and red lines (e.g., literature synthesis, data analysis, or writing done by AI).
  • Assess learning, not output polish: Use oral defenses, process logs, and version history to verify student understanding.
  • Build AI literacy: Offer short workshops for faculty and students on prompts, verification, bias, and proper citation. For structured options, see AI courses by job role.

Bottom line

Tsinghua's framework doesn't reject AI. It sets guardrails so learning and research stay human-led and accountable. Expect more universities to move in this direction-and more vendors to meet higher standards for transparency, safety, and academic integrity.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)
Advertisement
Stream Watch Guide