UK commissions AI skills review to keep finance competitive
The Treasury has tasked the Financial Services Skills Commission (FSSC) with a sweeping review of how AI and emerging technologies are reshaping the financial services workforce. In a letter from Economic Secretary to the Treasury Lucy Rigby MP, the government set a clear objective: embed digital and AI capability across the sector to protect the UK's lead as global competition accelerates.
With the UK economy under pressure to grow, the message is direct-skills drive productivity. The review is expected to inform workforce policy, employer training, and future spending decisions.
Mandate and scope
Rigby underscored that a highly skilled workforce across every region is central to growth. The letter builds on the government's Financial Services Growth and Competitiveness Strategy (July 2025), which made technology adoption and talent development core priorities.
The FSSC will examine the impact of AI, machine learning, and automation over the next five to ten years. The work includes a national and regional lens, recognising growing hubs in Edinburgh, Belfast, and Leeds. The original deadline set in the strategy is mid-2027.
Who's involved
The FSSC will collaborate with the City of London Corporation, TheCityUK, Lloyds Banking Group, and PwC. Their joint report will map the technologies most likely to reshape business models and define the skills required to deploy them at scale.
What the review will deliver
- Technology map: AI, ML, automation, and adjacent tools most likely to change front-, middle-, and back-office work.
- Skills blueprint: technical, analytical, and governance capabilities needed by role and seniority.
- Regional analysis: demand signals and training capacity beyond London.
- Cost-benefit models: projected ROI for upskilling and adoption.
- Actionable recommendations: steps for employers, providers, and policymakers that can scale.
Why this matters
AI is already embedded in British money management. More than 28 million UK adults now rely on AI-driven tools for personal finance. In firms, generative AI promises gains in compliance, customer service, and trading support-but the skills gap could widen without coordinated action.
This review can set the hiring agenda, direct regional investment, and align public-private training efforts. The core bet: long-term competitiveness depends on people, not just tech.
What finance leaders should do now
- Define a skills taxonomy: data, model risk, prompt fluency, orchestration, AI ops, and AI governance across roles.
- Run a baseline assessment: map current capability by team; identify critical gaps by function and region.
- Rebalance training budgets: shift spend to AI literacy for all staff and deep technical tracks for target roles.
- Pilot with guardrails: start with controlled use cases (KYC, QA in customer ops, policy drafting, trade surveillance triage) with human oversight.
- Strengthen governance: model risk management, data protection, operational resilience, and auditability from day one.
- Upgrade procurement: require transparency, evaluation datasets, bias testing, and fallback procedures from vendors.
- Build regional pipelines: partner with colleges and universities in Edinburgh, Belfast, Leeds, and other hubs for apprenticeships and mid-career retraining.
- Reward adoption: bake AI proficiency into job architectures, performance reviews, and progression.
What government and regulators can do
- Incentivise upskilling: targeted tax relief or matched funding for accredited AI training tied to measurable outcomes.
- Publish common skills standards: a reference model for AI roles, competencies, and assessment.
- Expand safe testbeds: sandboxes for data access, model validation, and algorithmic auditing.
- Back regional training capacity: grants for FE/HE providers to scale AI and data programmes aligned to employer demand.
- Set measurement baselines: track adoption, productivity per FTE, wage growth, and regional participation.
Metrics to track through 2027
- % of roles with defined AI skill requirements and L&D pathways
- Training hours per employee and completion rates by level
- Productivity per FTE in targeted processes (e.g., onboarding, claims, case handling)
- Time-to-competence for priority roles (risk, compliance, data, engineering)
- Automation coverage and quality outcomes (error rates, customer satisfaction)
- Regional hiring and retention in growth hubs
Risks to manage
- Bias and model drift without robust monitoring
- Data privacy breaches and shadow AI use
- Operational concentration risk from third-party models
- Workforce displacement without reskilling and internal mobility paths
Mitigation starts with governance, transparent testing, and clear rules on human oversight. Pair that with reskilling at scale and you keep both performance and trust intact.
Timeline and next steps
The FSSC's report is slated for mid-2027 and could influence future spending reviews, curricula, and employer programs. Don't wait for the final document to act-start building the skills backbone now.
- Set a 12-18 month roadmap with quarterly capability milestones.
- Embed AI literacy in induction and manager training.
- Stand up an internal AI council to align risk, tech, HR, and business units.
Where to build capability fast
If you need a structured way to upskill teams by role and proficiency, explore curated training paths and tools for finance professionals:
The policy signal is clear. The firms that invest in skills now will take the gains later.
Your membership also unlocks:
