How the Creative Content Exchange fits into UK AI policy - and what it means for creatives
The UK government is piloting a Creative Content Exchange: a marketplace where AI developers can license high-quality cultural data, and creators get paid for it. Details surfaced in parliament on 13 January 2026, with the pilot expected to start at the end of January and run for 12 months. The promise is simple: make licensing clear, trusted, and worth your time.
What is the Creative Content Exchange?
The Exchange is planned as a "trusted marketplace" for buying, selling, licensing, and enabling permitted access to digitised cultural and creative assets. The goal is two-sided: new revenue for rightsholders and streamlined, legal access for AI developers.
The pilot is supported by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). Procurement has sought a complete platform solution, with the Natural History Museum involved in proof of concept. The contract is set to run for a year from 30 January 2026, with a review at the halfway point and potential governance work if it moves forward.
Read the UK Creative Industries Sector Vision
An initial focus on public assets
Government officials say public institutions hold a large pool of untapped value: archives, recordings, images, scripts, datasets, and more. The pilot will test whether bringing these assets together can create real commercial value for both AI developers and the institutions that hold them. Expect emphasis on digitisation, metadata quality, and whether aggregation boosts usefulness for training models.
The culture secretary has been clear: national institutions like the National Archives, British Library, and the BBC could be "a gold-mine" for AI companies-if trust and incentives are there. Government doesn't plan to run the Exchange long-term; it aims to catalyse it and let the market operate.
Why this matters to creatives
- Clear route to market: A single place to list your work for AI training, with terms you set.
- Fairer pricing signals: A marketplace can help establish reference prices where none exist today.
- Better enforcement: If licensing flows through a trusted platform, small creators aren't stuck chasing cases alone.
- Control and visibility: You decide who gets access and for what uses, with an audit trail.
- Room for individuals: The pilot aims to include solo creators and small studios-not just big catalogues.
The caveats creators should watch
"Fair value" isn't guaranteed. If pricing is left entirely to market dynamics, larger buyers could still lean on their leverage. Creators will need clarity on minimums, usage tiers (training vs. fine-tuning vs. safety evals), reporting requirements, and remedies for misuse.
Scale and breadth may be a hurdle. High-quality cultural data matters, but AI developers also need volume and diversity. The pilot has to prove that public collections, properly digitised and tagged, are enough to spark consistent demand.
Law and transparency are still in flux. The government has signalled legislation on transparency for AI training, but workable tools and a practical opt-out mechanism aren't ready yet. The Exchange could help in practice, but it won't replace legal certainty. Creators will want assurance that choosing not to list content doesn't imply consent for copying.
What to do now to prepare your catalog
- Audit your rights: Confirm you own or control the training/licensing rights for each asset.
- Upgrade metadata: Add creator IDs, rights statements, usage constraints, and contact fields. Machine-readable where possible.
- Package assets: Prepare clean, well-organised datasets (plus low-res or excerpted previews) to speed due diligence.
- Define pricing and terms: Create a simple rate card: per-asset, per-collection, and usage tiers. Note minimums and attribution/reporting expectations.
- Set monitoring rules: Decide how you'll track use-hashing, watermarking, or third-party monitoring-and what triggers a takedown or renegotiation.
- Coordinate with peers: Consider collective representation for bargaining power and shared standards.
- Follow pilot updates: Keep an eye on UKRI communications and participating institutions for onboarding timelines.
Timeline and what's next
The pilot contract begins 30 January 2026 and runs for 12 months with a mid-point review. If it shows real value-especially for smaller creators-expect work on long-term governance and expansion beyond public collections. If not, it's back to the drawing board on licensing at scale.
For creatives, this is a slow burn. Use the next few months to get "exchange-ready"-rights cleared, metadata tight, pricing set, and sample packs prepared. If you're building your AI workflow skills in parallel, this can widen opportunities once the marketplace opens.
Practical AI courses by job role
Key questions that will decide its success
- How will pricing be governed-will there be reference rates, floors, or transparency on deal terms?
- What enforcement tools will the Exchange support for small creators?
- Will there be clean transparency APIs for model training disclosures and audit logs?
- How will opt-outs be treated, and will non-participation clearly signal "no copying"?
- What standards will define "quality data" for listings (format, provenance, labeling)?
- Will the platform support collective licensing or pre-negotiated frameworks for individuals?
- How will international buyers be handled if licensing and enforcement sit under UK law?
- How will revenue be shared with public institutions, and will that encourage large-scale digitisation?
The bottom line: if the pilot proves real demand and fair terms, the Exchange could become a practical way for creatives to license training rights without giving up leverage. Keep your catalog ready, stay close to updates, and control your value from day one.
Your membership also unlocks:
