US CFOs back AI for finance-on one condition: oversight
A new Wakefield Research survey of 100 US CFOs at companies with USD $50M-$500M revenue shows a clear consensus: AI is valuable, but it can't run unattended. 96% say AI's biggest upside is freeing teams for strategic work. Only 14% fully trust AI to produce accurate accounting data on its own. And 97% insist human oversight remains essential.
The shift is practical, not philosophical. Finance leaders are moving from "Can AI help?" to "How far can we automate while staying audit-ready?" The line in the sand: verifiable outputs, clear decision trails, and judgment about when to escalate to a human.
Where AI adds value-and where it doesn't
The study describes two models in use. First, AI copilots that assist but still force accountants to check transactions one by one-useful, but the productivity lift is modest. Second, "end-to-end" agents that take full control-faster on paper, but viewed as risky due to opaque logic, thin audit trails, and weak business context.
What CFOs actually want is intelligent escalation: systems that clear routine items at speed and surface exceptions with context. As one CFO put it, "We need an autopilot-fast, accurate and with the sound judgment of our most reliable accountant."
Audit expectations haven't changed-your AI must meet them
Internal controls still demand evidence: who made the decision, what data supported it, and which rules applied. Accuracy and speed now sit alongside auditability as non-negotiables. That means logs, decision rationales, and reproducibility for every automated action.
If you're benchmarking frameworks, look at the NIST AI Risk Management Framework for governance guidance (NIST AI RMF) and how auditors assess control environments such as SOC 1 reporting (AICPA SOC 1 overview).
Vendor positioning: transparency over claims
The research cites Maximor, which positions its software as an "Audit-Ready Agent" that outputs fully verifiable records and decision traces. That pitch aligns with the oversight-first stance most CFOs report.
Dominic Rand, CFO, Kiva Brands, shared a common evaluation experience: "We evaluated several AI solutions, and the difference was night and day. Most tools either wanted full control with zero transparency, or they created more work for my team. What we needed was what Maximor delivered: AI that could handle the routine with speed and precision and knew exactly when to bring a human into the loop. That's when automation becomes a partnership, not a risk."
Ramnandan Krishnamurthy, Co-Founder and CEO, Maximor, ties it to a broader market shift: "When intelligence becomes commoditized, judgment becomes the competitive advantage. CFOs aren't asking for smarter AI-they're asking for AI that knows its limits."
Adoption signals: prioritize rule clarity and control fit
Between 60% and 77% of CFOs plan to adopt AI depending on the use case. That spread suggests a simple filter: tasks with clear rules and strong control frameworks move first; ambiguous work waits. Expect continued focus on accounts payable, expense processing, reconciliations, close, and reporting workflows.
Claims about automation will face scrutiny from leaders who sign off the numbers. Tools that can't document decisions or handle exceptions cleanly will stall after pilots, no matter how fast their throughput looks in demos.
What finance leaders can do now
- Segment processes by rule clarity and risk. Automate the stable, rules-based tiers first.
- Define your escalation policy. Set thresholds, exception categories, and required context for handoffs.
- Require verifiable decision trails. Every automated action needs inputs, rules applied, and approver of record.
- Pilot with auditor involvement. Agree on evidence standards before rollout to avoid rework later.
- Measure results beyond speed: exception rate, rework percentage, variance impacts, and time-to-close.
- Hold vendors to "explainability on demand." If your team can't audit it, don't ship it.
- Upskill your team on AI oversight and controls. Strong judgment turns automation into leverage.
Bottom line
CFOs aren't rejecting AI-they're insisting on control. The winning model is simple: automate routine work, keep humans in the loop for judgment calls, and make every decision auditable. If a tool can't show its work, it won't make it into live accounting operations.
Looking for practical options that fit finance workflows? Explore vetted AI tools for finance here: AI tools for finance.
Your membership also unlocks:
