Governance and the Promise of Artificial Intelligence
AI won't "destroy" work. It will strip out routine. That's a problem if your day is 80% forms, rules, and repeatable steps.
One estimate from Goldman Sachs suggests hundreds of millions of jobs face some level of automation risk, including a large share in advanced economies. The signal is clear: routine equals replaceable. Source.
What's actually at risk
Clerical tasks, data entry, and compliance checks are the first to go. They're rules-based, repetitive, and easy to codify.
But the spillover hits supporting roles too: paralegals, junior legal associates, financial analysts, research aides, report writers, and content producers. Government has a lot of this work. That's why so many public roles feel exposed.
Why government roles are exposed
Most government processes are built on predictable workflows and strict rules. That's perfect territory for software and models.
Think permits, claims, case updates, standard letters, scheduling, and level-one support. If a checklist can do it, AI can do it faster and cheaper.
What stays human in public service
Here's the good news: government isn't a factory. It sits on judgment, trust, and accountability. Those don't automate cleanly.
- Policy intent and trade-offs: balancing competing interests and values.
- Edge cases: exceptions, ambiguity, and human context.
- Public trust: clear explanations, fairness, and due process.
- Accountability: who answers when systems fail.
- Field work: inspections, community engagement, crisis response.
- Procurement, vendor oversight, and audit with real consequences.
How to make your job AI-proof
Your goal: move up the value chain. Shift from doing tasks to designing systems, setting rules, and checking outcomes.
- Redesign processes: map the workflow, strip waste, standardize inputs, and mark steps for automation.
- Own the prompts: write, test, and maintain prompts for your unit's work products (summaries, letters, briefs, FAQs).
- Guard the data: clean datasets, define access, and set quality thresholds. Bad data means bad decisions.
- Build oversight: define metrics, audits, exception queues, and appeals. Humans decide edge cases.
- Explain decisions: craft citizen-facing explanations that are plain, fair, and defensible.
- Strengthen vendor management: write requirements, test outputs, and enforce service levels.
Practical first moves this quarter
- 30 minutes a day: use an AI tool to draft emails, summarize reports, or prepare briefings. Measure time saved.
- Create a task inventory: column A = tasks, B = rules, C = variability. Automate high-rule, low-variability first.
- Draft standard prompts: for policy summaries, meeting notes, citizen replies, and checklists. Version-control them.
- Define a review loop: 10% random sampling of AI outputs, with a simple pass/fail rubric and reasons.
- Establish exception criteria: what must a human look at? Document it. Train the team.
- Start a two-page AI policy: allowed tools, data handling, review steps, and escalation paths.
Roles likely to gain importance
- Policy and program design with measurable outcomes.
- Data governance, privacy, and records compliance.
- Human-centered communications and service design.
- Procurement and vendor oversight for AI systems.
- Risk, audit, and ethics review with real enforcement.
- Emergency response and field inspections where context matters.
Skills to build fast
- Prompt writing and workflow automation basics.
- Data literacy: cleaning, labeling, and simple analysis.
- Process mapping: swimlanes, bottlenecks, and controls.
- Model limits: bias, hallucinations, and failure modes.
- Plain-language writing for public communication.
If you need structured options, browse job-focused AI learning paths: Complete AI Training - Courses by Job.
Guardrails that protect the public
- Transparency: label AI-assisted decisions and provide explanations.
- Appeals: clear paths for citizens to contest outcomes.
- Equity checks: test for disparate impact across groups.
- Security: lock down sensitive data and access to tools.
- Human-in-the-loop: mandate review for high-stakes decisions.
A realistic path forward
Yes, a large chunk of government work is automatable. That's the wake-up call, not the obituary.
The people who stay valuable are the ones who can design the process, set the guardrails, and explain the decision to the public-cleanly and fairly. Shift your time there.
Start small, prove value, document the wins, and make AI the intern-not the boss.
Your membership also unlocks:
