Wikipedia's New Guide to Spot AI Writing: A Practical Brief for Writers
Wikipedia has introduced a "Signs of AI writing" section that compiles hundreds of real examples to help readers spot machine-written text. As AI content spreads, this guide is a clear signal: clarity, originality, and voice now matter more than ever for working writers.
The guide focuses on patterns and stylistic habits that show up again and again in AI prose. It's not anti-AI; it's pro-clarity. The core concern is homogenization-content starting to sound the same-which could weaken search engines and even Wikipedia if readers can't tell what's distinctive or trustworthy.
Patterns Wikipedia Calls Out
- Stock phrases such as "encompassing," "valuable insight," and "key turning point."
- Excessive bolding for emphasis when it isn't needed.
- Emojis slipping into formal text where they don't fit.
These are small tells on their own, but together they form a pattern. Spot a cluster of them and you have a stronger case the text came from a model.
Why This Matters for Working Writers
Clients, editors, and readers are becoming more sensitive to generic writing. If your work blends into the feed, it'll be judged as average-no matter how accurate it is.
Wikipedia's warning about sameness should hit home. If everyone publishes lookalike copy, visibility drops and trust erodes. Distinct voice and useful specifics are now a competitive edge.
Make Your Writing Unmistakably Human
- Replace template phrases with precise language tied to your topic, audience, or data.
- Vary sentence length. Short. Then long. Then something in the middle. Break the rhythm on purpose.
- Add concrete details: numbers, dates, sources, a brief anecdote, or a first-hand observation.
- Use bold sparingly. If everything is emphasized, nothing is.
- Keep tone consistent. Formal pieces don't need emojis; casual posts don't need stiff phrasing.
- Favor specifics over summaries. Cut filler adverbs and hedges.
- Edit for clarity, not word count. If a paragraph says nothing new, delete it.
Quick Self-Audit Before You Publish
- Scan for repeated filler phrases (highlight them) and replace with sharper language.
- Read it aloud. If it drones or feels interchangeable with any other article, inject detail or a point of view.
- Check formatting-remove needless bold and tidy headings.
- Look for a concrete takeaway in each section. If there isn't one, add it or cut the section.
- Verify any claims with a source link or a named reference where appropriate.
If you want background on how large language models work and why their prose clusters around certain patterns, see Wikipedia's overview of LLMs.
Working With AI Without Losing Your Voice
Use AI as a draft assistant, not a final author. Feed it your angle, examples, and constraints-then rewrite the output so it sounds like you and adds something specific to the reader.
For structured ways to prompt and edit with intent, explore practical resources on prompt engineering or scan toolsets for copywriting workflows.
The Bottom Line
Wikipedia's guide isn't a ban; it's a mirror. If your writing reads like everyone else's, expect less reach and less trust. Make it specific, useful, and unmistakably yours.
Your membership also unlocks: