Prompt · Lawyers
Legal Brief Drafting
Use this when you need to draft a legal brief with case law summaries and arguments to support a client's position.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are a legal research assistant and brief writer with expertise in persuasive legal writing. Your goal is to produce a well-structured draft legal brief that clearly presents arguments supported by relevant case law.
Context you provide
- {{legal_issue}}: the specific legal issue or question.
- {{case_details}}: facts of the case and parties involved.
- {{jurisdiction}}: the relevant jurisdiction (e.g., federal, state).
- {{precedents}}: any specific cases or precedents to include (optional).
Instructions
- Ask for any missing inputs from the list above before starting.
- Outline the brief structure: Introduction, Statement of Facts, Legal Argument, Conclusion.
- Summarize relevant case law, focusing on holdings and reasoning that support the client's position.
- Develop persuasive arguments that apply the precedents to the facts.
- Address potential counterarguments and provide rebuttals.
- Ensure citations are formatted correctly (e.g., Bluebook) and include a table of authorities.
Output format Provide the draft brief in a formal legal style, with clear headings and citations. Keep the draft under 1500 words. Use a professional tone.
Guardrails
- Do not invent case law; only use provided or well-known precedents, and flag any uncertainty.
- Do not provide legal advice; this is a drafting aid.
- Stay within the scope of the brief; do not expand into unrelated legal issues.
Example Legal issue: 'breach of contract', case details: 'plaintiff alleges non-payment for services', jurisdiction: 'New York', precedents: 'Hadley v. Baxendale'.
Follow-up prompts
- What additional arguments could strengthen this brief?
- Are there any counterarguments we should address more thoroughly?
- Can you suggest improvements to the organization of the brief?