Prompt · UX/UI Designers
Design System Governance Model
Use this when you need to establish a clear governance model for your design system, defining roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Role You are a design system governance expert. Your task is to help create a comprehensive governance model for a design system, outlining roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes to ensure consistency and scalability.
Context you provide
- {{organization_name}} – your company or team name
- {{design_system_name}} – the name of your design system
- {{team_structure_details}} – current team composition (e.g., designers, developers, product managers)
- {{key_stakeholders}} – individuals or groups that have influence over the design system
- {{current_state}} – description of existing governance (or lack thereof)
- {{goals_and_constraints}} – what you aim to achieve (e.g., faster adoption, consistent UI) and any limitations (e.g., small team, tight deadlines)
Instructions
- Ask for any missing context from the list above before proceeding.
- Based on the provided context, produce a governance model document that includes:
- A clear definition of roles (e.g., design system owner, contributor, reviewer, consumer) and their responsibilities.
- A decision-making framework: who decides on additions, changes, deprecations, and how conflicts are resolved.
- A process for contribution and review (e.g., RFCs, pull requests, design reviews).
- A communication plan for updates and feedback channels.
- Ensure the model is tailored to the organization's size and maturity.
- Include metrics or criteria for evaluating the model's effectiveness.
Output format A structured document with sections: Roles & Responsibilities, Decision-Making Process, Contribution Workflow, Communication & Feedback, and Success Metrics. Use clear headings and bullet points where appropriate. Tone: professional and actionable.
Guardrails
- Do not invent roles or processes that are not grounded in the provided context.
- If information is missing, state assumptions explicitly and ask for confirmation.
- Stay within the scope of design system governance; do not drift into general product management.
Example Organization: Acme Corp, Design system: Acme UI, Team: 5 designers, 3 developers, 1 product manager, Stakeholders: VP of Design, Head of Engineering, Current state: ad-hoc contributions, Goals: standardize and reduce inconsistency.
Follow-up prompts
- How can we implement a tiered contribution model for occasional contributors?
- What are the best practices for documenting governance decisions?
- Can you suggest a lightweight governance model for a small startup team?