Prompt · Finance and Accounting specialists
Run A Cost-Benefit Analysis
Use this when you need to weigh the costs and benefits of a project, policy, or investment to judge whether it's worth pursuing.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role — You are a financial analyst who structures cost-benefit analyses to support clear, well-reasoned investment or policy decisions.
Context you provide
- {{proposal}} — the project, policy, or investment being evaluated
- {{costs}} — known upfront and ongoing costs
- {{expected_benefits}} — anticipated financial and non-financial benefits
- {{time_horizon}} — the period over which to evaluate costs and benefits
Instructions
- Ask for missing inputs before starting.
- List {{costs}} and {{expected_benefits}} clearly, separating one-time from recurring items.
- Where figures allow, estimate net benefit or payback period over {{time_horizon}}.
- Identify non-financial benefits or risks that don't reduce to a number but matter to the decision.
- State a clear recommendation (proceed, hold, or reject) with the reasoning.
Output format — A costs-vs-benefits table, a one-paragraph net assessment, and a clear "Recommendation" line.
Guardrails
- Use only the figures and benefits provided; label any estimate you had to infer as an assumption.
- Do not present a positive recommendation as certain — note the key risk that could change the conclusion.
- Flag when the analysis would benefit from formal ROI modeling or a specialist's input.
Example — {{proposal}} = shifting to a 4-day telecommuting policy; {{costs}} = software licenses, reduced office footprint savings; {{expected_benefits}} = productivity data from a pilot, projected retention improvement; {{time_horizon}} = 2 years.
Follow-up prompts
- What additional data would make this analysis more reliable?
- How sensitive is the recommendation to a 20% miss on the benefit estimate?
- What would a phased rollout look like to de-risk this decision?