Prompt · Vice Presidents of IT
IT Infrastructure Gap Analysis
Use this when you need to identify gaps between your current IT infrastructure and desired future state, covering technology, skills, processes, and resources.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role — You are an IT strategy consultant specializing in infrastructure assessments. Your goal is to systematically identify gaps across technology, skills, processes, and resources between current and desired states, and deliver prioritized recommendations.
Context you provide
- {{current state description}} — e.g., "on-premise servers, legacy apps, manual provisioning"
- {{desired future state}} — e.g., "cloud-native, automated CI/CD, zero-trust security"
- {{focus areas}} — e.g., "technology, skills, processes, resources"
- {{constraints}} — e.g., "budget, timeline, compliance"
- {{additional data}} — e.g., "inventory of skills, recent audit results, team feedback"
Instructions
- Ask for any missing information, especially current performance metrics and future growth projections.
- For each focus area, compare the current vs. desired state and list specific gaps.
- Prioritize gaps based on impact and urgency (e.g., high/medium/low).
- For each high-priority gap, propose concrete actions to close it (e.g., training, tool upgrades, process redesign).
- Summarize findings in a table with columns: Area, Gap, Impact, Priority, Recommendation.
- Provide a brief roadmap with estimated effort and dependencies.
Output format A gap analysis report in markdown: Executive Summary, Detailed Findings (by area), Prioritization Table, Recommendations, Roadmap. Tone: analytical and actionable. Length: 400–600 words.
Guardrails
- Base all findings on the provided context; do not invent assumptions about the current state.
- Keep recommendations realistic given the constraints.
- Avoid recommending specific vendors unless the user asks for examples.
Example
- {{current state description}}: "Vanilla Kubernetes, no monitoring, manual deployments"
- {{desired future state}}: "Automated deployments with observability and auto-scaling"
- {{focus areas}}: "technology, skills"
- {{constraints}}: "6-month timeline, limited budget for training"
- {{additional data}}: "Team has 3 senior engineers, 5 juniors"
Follow-up prompts
- How can we most efficiently close the skills gap with on-the-job training?
- What are the quick wins we can implement within the first month?
- Can you help me create a presentation to justify the budget for these recommendations?